LEADER 04030 am 22006853u 450 001 9910563175203321 005 20230617032127.0 010 $a9783205770688 (ebook) 035 $a(CKB)3710000000470319 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001692323 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16542400 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001692323 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)15034266 035 $a(PQKB)25087977 035 $a(WaSeSS)IndRDA00058390 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/30715 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000470319 100 $a20160829d2003 uy | 101 0 $ager 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aGefangenschaft, Revolution, Heimkehr $edie Bedeutung der Kriegsgefangenenproblematik für die Geschichte des Kommunismus in Mittel- und Osteuropa 1917-1920 /$fHannes Leidinger, Verena Moritz 210 $cBöhlau$d2003 210 31$aGermany :$cBo?hlau,$d2003 215 $a1 online resource (754 pages) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 330 $aUp to the 1980s prisoners of war were hardly even mentioned in military history. Only in recent years have scientists acknowledged the importance of this topic. For their investigations some of them chose the First World War, especially the Eastern front, where more than 5 million soldiers were captured until the revolutionary events of 1917/18. Contrary to the few existing studies, the present publication concentrates more on the evaluation of captivity in the historical background rather than on the description of "POW-fates" in "the hands of their enemies". It therefore focuses on the meaning of captivity and repatriation during the Russian Revolution and the establishment of the Communist International. Based on documents of the central archives in Vienna and Moscow, the thesis comes to the following results: On the one hand, conflicts between the soldiers of the Central Powers in the former Tsarist empire, in particular between the Austro-Hungarian nationalities, for example between the "Bolshevik internationalists" and the "Czech Legion", played a decisive role in the beginning of an Eastern European "period of confusion" which can hardly be entitled a "Russian Civil War". On the other hand, former prisoners functioned as founders of the Comintern and leaders of the first communist parties outside Soviet Russia. The activities of POWs thus marked the starting point of the international cadrerecruitment for the Comintern, which became a significant aspect in the foreign politics of the "first proletarian republic" and consequently in the so called "short 20th century" defined by the existence of the USSR and its "satellite states". 606 $aCommunism$xHistory$y20th century$zEurope, Central 606 $aCommunism$xHistory$y20th century$zEurope, Eastern 606 $aPrisoners of war$xHistory$y20th century$zEurope, Central 606 $aPrisoners of war$xHistory$y20th Century$zEurope, Eastern 606 $aSocialism, Communism & Anarchism$2HILCC 606 $aPolitical Science$2HILCC 606 $aLaw, Politics & Government$2HILCC 610 $aFirst Wold War 610 $aEastern front 610 $aprisoners 610 $aErster Weltkrieg 610 $aOstmitteleuropa 610 $aKommunismusforschung 610 $aKriegsgefangenenforschung 610 $aRussland 610 $aUngarn 615 0$aCommunism$xHistory 615 0$aCommunism$xHistory 615 0$aPrisoners of war$xHistory 615 0$aPrisoners of war$xHistory 615 7$aSocialism, Communism & Anarchism 615 7$aPolitical Science 615 7$aLaw, Politics & Government 700 $aLeidinger$b Hannes$01223040 702 $aMoritz$b Verena 801 0$bPQKB 801 2$bUkMaJRU 912 $a9910563175203321 996 $aGefangenschaft, Revolution, Heimkehr$92837064 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03472nam 2200577 450 001 9910791037403321 005 20200903223051.0 010 $a90-04-26965-7 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004269651 035 $a(CKB)2550000001298028 035 $a(EBL)1688665 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001193609 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11627541 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001193609 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11136201 035 $a(PQKB)10111484 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1688665 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004269651 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1688665 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10870364 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL608446 035 $a(OCoLC)879947759 035 $a(PPN)17891469X 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001298028 100 $a20140521h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAncient Hebrew periodization and the language of the Book of Jeremiah $ethe case for a sixth-century date of composition /$fby Aaron D. Hornkohl 210 1$aLeiden, The Netherlands :$cBrill,$d2014. 210 4$d©2014 215 $a1 online resource (525 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics,$x0081-8461 ;$vVolume 74 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-26964-9 311 $a1-306-77195-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $tPreliminary Material /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t1 Introduction /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t2 The Language of the Book of Jeremiah /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t3 Orthography and Phonology /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t4 Pronominal Morphology /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t5 Nominal Morphology /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t6 Verbal Morphology /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t7 Syntax /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t8 Lexical Features /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t9 The Linguistic Profiles of the Short Edition and the Supplementary Material of Jeremiah /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $t10 Conclusion /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $tBibliography /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $tIndex of Foreign Words and Phrases /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $tPassage Index /$rAaron D. Hornkohl -- $tSubject Index /$rAaron D. Hornkohl. 330 $aIn Ancient Hebrew Periodization and the Language of the Book of Jeremiah , Aaron Hornkohl defends the diachronic approach to Biblical Hebrew and the linguistic dating of biblical texts. Applying the standard methodologies to the Masoretic version of the biblical book of Jeremiah, he seeks to date the work on the basis of its linguistic profile, determining that, though composite, Jeremiah is likely a product of the transitional time between the First and Second Temple Periods. Hornkohl also contributes to unraveling Jeremiah?s complicated literary development, arguing on the basis of language that its 'short edition', as reflected in the book?s Old Greek translation, predates that 'supplementary material' preserved in the Masoretic edition but unparalleled in the Greek. Nevertheless, he concludes that neither is written in Late Biblical Hebrew proper. 410 0$aStudies in Semitic languages and linguistics ;$vVolume 74. 676 $a224/.2066 700 $aHornkohl$b Aaron D.$0851328 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910791037403321 996 $aAncient Hebrew periodization and the language of the Book of Jeremiah$93817430 997 $aUNINA