LEADER 03419nam  22005895  450 
001 9910559384103321
005 20231110143459.0
010   $a9783030953690$b(electronic bk.)
010   $z9783030953683
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-95369-0
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6951415
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6951415
035   $a(CKB)21502475800041
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-95369-0
035   $a(EXLCZ)9921502475800041
100   $a20220411d2022      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aPhilosophy and Neuroscience $eA Methodological Analysis /$fby Steven S. Gouveia
205   $a1st ed. 2022.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2022.
215   $a1 online resource (321 pages)
225 1 $aNew Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science,$x2946-2967
311 08$aPrint version: Gouveia, Steven S. Philosophy and Neuroscience Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 9783030953683 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aChapter 1 - Methodological Problem in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Chapter 2 - Methodological Isolationism -- Chapter 3 - Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 4 - Neurophenomenology -- Chapter 5 - Non-Reductive Neurophilosophy -- Chapter 6 - Qualia and Information in Philosophy and Neuroscience -- Conclusion.
330   $aThis book explores the methodological strategies for linking philosophy and neuroscience concerning the study of the conscious brain. The author focuses on four distinct methods for relating these two academic disciplines: isolationist, reductionist, neurophenomenological, and non-reductionist. After analyzing the pros and cons of these approaches, Steven S. Gouveia applies them to the concept of Qualia and Information to understand how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each approach influence the definitions of those specific concepts. Gouveia argues for an approach that conceives the interdisciplinarity of both philosophy and neuroscience, in a particular and sound methodology, offering empirical examples of the explanatory power of this methodology over the others. Additionally, he shows how the metaphilosophical assumptions of each methodology-usually taken by researchers implicitly and unconsciously-influence their own approach to the methodological problem. Steven S. Gouveia is a Post Doctoral Research Fellow at the Mind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Unit of the Royal Institute of Mental Health, University of Ottawa, Canada.
410  0$aNew Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science,$x2946-2967
606   $aPhilosophy of mind
606   $aKnowledge, Theory of
606   $aCognitive neuroscience
606   $aPhilosophy of Mind
606   $aEpistemology
606   $aCognitive Neuroscience
615  0$aPhilosophy of mind.
615  0$aKnowledge, Theory of.
615  0$aCognitive neuroscience.
615 14$aPhilosophy of Mind.
615 24$aEpistemology.
615 24$aCognitive Neuroscience.
676   $a612.801
676   $a612.801
700   $aGouveia$b Steven S.$01221604
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
912   $a9910559384103321
996   $aPhilosophy and Neuroscience$92832770
997   $aUNINA