LEADER 02123nam  2200373   450 
001 9910557952003321
005 20230219084003.0
035   $a(CKB)5400000000046994
035   $a(NjHacI)995400000000046994
035   $a(EXLCZ)995400000000046994
100   $a20230219d2009      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 00$aConstitutional Court Review 2008 - 1 /$fedited by Stu Woolman, Theunis Roux and Danie Brand
210  1$aPretoria, South Africa :$cPretoria University Law Press,$d2009.
210  4$d©2009
215   $a1 online resource (v pages) $cillustrations
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
330   $aThe Constitutional Court Review is a once-a-year journal dedicated to the analysis of the Constitutional Court's decisions of the previous year. Its purpose is to provide a platform for high-level academic engagement with the jurisprudence of the South African Constitutional Court. To this end, each issue of the Review contains two lead essays exploring broad themes arising from a given year's jurisprudence (each ± 20 000 words), each with its own response (± 5 000 words); a number of shorter subject-specific articles (each ± 10 000 words); and several case comments that engage more narrowly with a given decision of the Constitutional Court (each ± 5 000 words). Lead essays are solicited by the editors, as are some of the subjectspecific articles and case notes, but for the remainder unsolicited contributions are invited. Such contributions must be sent to the editors at danie.brand@up.ac.za in MS Word format on or before 31 May of the year following that on which a contribution focuses.
606   $aConstitutional law
615  0$aConstitutional law.
676   $a342
702   $aWoolman$b Stu
702   $aRoux$b Theunis
702   $aBrand$b Danie
801  0$bNjHacI
801  1$bNjHacl
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910557952003321
996   $aConstitutional Court Review 2008 - 1$92822881
997   $aUNINA