LEADER 04749nam 2200937z- 450 001 9910557613603321 005 20231214132939.0 035 $a(CKB)5400000000045266 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/79668 035 $a(EXLCZ)995400000000045266 100 $a20202203d2022 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aCorporate Social Responsibility: Organizational Strategy for Sustainable Growth 210 $aBasel$cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2022 215 $a1 electronic resource (194 p.) 311 $a3-0365-3072-X 311 $a3-0365-3073-8 330 $aWe often cast a question whether unethical behavior (corporate irresponsible activities) undertaken by international firms in developing countries is really entirely unethical or simply unavoidable grease, which is necessary to facilitate short-term growth in overseas markets. Both strategic management and international business scholars have long attempted to examine the outcomes of corporate social responsibility (CSR) primarily in the organizational strategic aspect. Due to this, they are turning a blind eye to firms? unethical attitude and pretending not to notice that it is happening. In other words, we do not yet know enough about CSR from a long-term perspective and its relationship with sustainable growth for the long-term. We should also acknowledge that a firm?s unethical management is both a primary cause and a result of poverty in our economy, which means that a firm?s irresponsible activities (as an antonym of CSR) cannot be justified by any reason. This also represents the importance of research exploring CSR. We believe that this is the time to, first, synthesize diverse research fragments on CSR, second, combine it with an additional unique agenda (e.g., human rights, win-win partnership, official development assistance) particularly in the sustainability domain, and then third, compile all the theoretical and empirical pieces for organizational sustainability. By inviting submissions from researchers who studies various theoretical perspectives, adopts varied empirical approaches, and examines at multiple levels of analysis, as well as qualitative and quantitative experiments, literature reviews, and meta-analyses, this SI draws a big picture. We are strongly convinced that papers accepted by this SI significantly contribute to current relevant debates by filling many extant research gaps. 517 $aCorporate Social Responsibility 606 $aTechnology: general issues$2bicssc 606 $aHistory of engineering & technology$2bicssc 610 $aFourth Industrial Revolution 610 $aCSR authenticity 610 $adigital transformation 610 $amediating effect 610 $aChina 610 $aKorea 610 $acorporate social responsibility 610 $aconstruction sector 610 $astrategy 610 $amotives 610 $abarriers 610 $aeffects 610 $aCSR perception 610 $aorganizational commitment 610 $aintrinsic motivation 610 $amoderating effect 610 $atask-technology fit theory 610 $agreen agri-food firm 610 $alivestreaming e-commerce 610 $aadoption 610 $afirm performance 610 $astrategic orientation 610 $adigital capabilities 610 $anew product development performance 610 $ainnovation 610 $aCEO compensation structure 610 $asocial exchange 610 $aequity 610 $astrategic competitiveness 610 $aMCF analysis 610 $ainternal control 610 $atechnological innovation 610 $amediated effect 610 $alogistics service 610 $atraining service 610 $asubjective norms 610 $aself-efficiency sense 610 $aelaboration likelihood model 610 $aattitude 610 $aword-of-mouth 610 $agovernance indicators 610 $ainformation technology 610 $amaturity models 610 $aSME 610 $asoftware 610 $asustainability indicators 615 7$aTechnology: general issues 615 7$aHistory of engineering & technology 700 $aPark$b Byung Il$4edt$01314876 702 $aXiao$b Simon Shufeng$4edt 702 $aPark$b Byung Il$4oth 702 $aXiao$b Simon Shufeng$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910557613603321 996 $aCorporate Social Responsibility: Organizational Strategy for Sustainable Growth$93032079 997 $aUNINA