LEADER 02353nam  2200505   450 
001 9910557558003321
005 20210408
010   $a3-8325-9078-1
024 8 $ahttps://doi.org/10.30819/4701
035   $a(CKB)4100000005387724
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5473445
035   $a5c7aad82-a4e4-46e0-b995-7583b0dd2d03
035   $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64497
035   $a(ScCtBLL)7fd8855f-a907-4de0-8b84-9a5088b16b38
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000005387724
100   $a20180821d2018      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aTheories of metaphor revised $eagainst a cognitive theory of metaphor: an apology for classical metaphor /$fby Stephan Kessler
205   $a2., revised edition
210   $aBerlin/Germany$cLogos Verlag Berlin$d2018
210  1$aBerlin :$cLogos Verlag,$d2018.
215   $a1 online resource (148 pages)
300   $aPublicationDate: 20180530
311   $a3-8325-4701-0 
330   $aLong description: Research that deals with metaphors and linguistic imagery has increased in the last thirty years. However, studies that question existing theories of metaphor from a comparative perspective are less common.           The reason for the present theoretical sketch was the metaphorical model of conceptualism, alias the cognitive theory of metaphor: at least with this theory, `metaphor' itself has become a metaphor, and the classical, rhetorical metaphor has been sidelined. Kessler's book not only criticises existing theories of metaphor, but also develops from them a discursive synthesis that seeks to rehabilitate the classical metaphor as an everyday pragmalinguistic phenomenon. For this purpose, the nature of thought, the mental lexicon, predication and word semantics are also covered.
606   $aMetaphor
610   $aMetapher
610   $aConceptualism
610   $aMetaphor Theory
610   $aLiterary Images
610   $aPragmalinguistics
615  0$aMetaphor.
676   $a808
700   $aKessler$b Stephan$0935416
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910557558003321
996   $aTheories of metaphor revised$92828007
997   $aUNINA