LEADER 03962nam 2200769z- 450 001 9910557443803321 005 20240919020753.0 035 $a(CKB)5400000000043284 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/77068 035 $a(EXLCZ)995400000000043284 100 $a20202201d2021 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEvaluation of Boulder Deposits Linked to Late Neogene Hurricane Events 210 $aBasel, Switzerland$cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2021 215 $a1 electronic resource (180 p.) 311 $a3-0365-2578-5 311 $a3-0365-2579-3 330 $aContributions in this collection discuss storm deposits dating from Neogene time between 23 and 1.8 million years ago, as well as the last 1.8 million years, including the Pleistocene and Holocene. As today, past hurricane events were responsible for the erosion of rocky shorelines due to the impact of storm waves, in addition to flood deposits due to heavy rainfall after big storms, resulting in landfall. The former typically resulted in coastal boulder deposits (CBDs) and the latter in coastal outwash deposits (CODs). Study locations covered by this treatment include three within the confines of Mexico?s Gulf of California and three in the northeast Atlantic Ocean, including the Canary Islands and Azores, as well as the coast of Norway. Rock types canvassed in these studies are dominated by igneous rocks that include surface flows such as andesite and basalt as well as surface exposures of plutonic rocks that originated deep below the surface such as granite and near-mantle rocks like low-grade chromite. These rock types reflect a range in rock density, which has an effect on the ability of storm waves to degrade rocky shores in the production of CBDs. The site-specific studies in this collection also share an application treating the shape of boulders resulting from shore erosion. The collection is introduced by a survey covering Neogene CODs registered in the geological literature and a concluding paper focused on the use of satellite images as a means for detecting previously unrecognized coastal storm deposits. 606 $aResearch & information: general$2bicssc 607 $aKalgoorlie-Boulder (SE WA Goldfields SH51-09)$2aiatsisp 610 $abibliography 610 $alarge clasts 610 $aMiocene 610 $aPliocene 610 $arocky shore 610 $astorm 610 $atsunami 610 $abarrier boulder deposits 610 $ahurricane storm surge 610 $ahydrodynamic equation 610 $aGulf of California (Mexico) 610 $aremote sensing 610 $abouldering tourism 610 $aIberian Peninsula 610 $aMediterranean 610 $aIndonesia 610 $aCentral America 610 $acoastal boulder deposits 610 $astorm surge 610 $ahydrodynamic equations 610 $aHolocene 610 $aPleistocene 610 $aMIS 5e (Marine Isotope Substage 5e) 610 $aNE Atlantic Ocean 610 $astorm waves 610 $awestern North America 610 $acoastal storm deposits 610 $ahigh-latitude settings 610 $aupper pleistocene 610 $amarine isotope substage 5e 610 $aNorth Atlantic Ocean 610 $acoastal erosion 610 $aMarine Isotope Substage 5e 610 $aGulf of California 615 7$aResearch & information: general 700 $aJohnson$b Markes E$4edt$01297566 702 $aLedesma-Va?zquez$b Jorge$4edt 702 $aJohnson$b Markes E$4oth 702 $aLedesma-Va?zquez$b Jorge$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910557443803321 996 $aEvaluation of Boulder Deposits Linked to Late Neogene Hurricane Events$93024552 997 $aUNINA