LEADER 04562nam 2201045z- 450 001 9910557136103321 005 20210501 035 $a(CKB)5400000000040692 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/68276 035 $a(oapen)doab68276 035 $a(EXLCZ)995400000000040692 100 $a20202105d2021 |y 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn|---annan 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aDoes Commons Grabbing Lead to Resilience Grabbing?$eThe Anti-Politics Machine of Neo-Liberal Development and Local Responses 210 $aBasel, Switzerland$cMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute$d2021 215 $a1 online resource (236 p.) 311 08$a3-03943-839-5 311 08$a3-03943-840-9 330 $aThis Special Issue contributes to the debate on land grabbing as commons grabbing with a special focus on how the development of state institutions (formal laws and regulations for agrarian development and compensations) and voluntary corporate social responsibility (CRS) initiatives have enabled the grabbing process. It also looks at how these institutions and CSR programs are used as development strategies of states and companies to legitimate their investments. This Special Issue includes case studies from Kenya, Morocco, Tanzania, Cambodia, Bolivia and Ecuador analysing how these strategies are embedded into neo-liberal ideologies of economic development. We propose looking at James Ferguson's notion of the Anti-Politics Machine (1990) that served to uncover the hidden political basis of state-driven development strategies. We think it is of interest to test the approach for analysing development discourses and CSR-policies in agrarian investments. We argue based on a New Institutional Political Ecology (NIPE) approach that these legitimize the institutional change from common to state and private property of land and land related common pool resources which is the basis of commons grabbing that also grabbed the capacity for resilience of local people. 517 $aDoes Commons Grabbing Lead to Resilience Grabbing? 606 $aHistory$2bicssc 606 $aSocial and cultural anthropology$2bicssc 606 $aSocial and ethical issues$2bicssc 610 $aactors 610 $aagro-industrial food system 610 $aagroecosystems and agroecosystem service 610 $aco-management concept 610 $acommercialization of herding 610 $acommon pool resources 610 $aCommon Pool Resources (CPRs) 610 $acommon property 610 $acommon-pool resources 610 $acommons 610 $acommons grabbing 610 $acommunal land titling 610 $aCommunity Land Act and customary law 610 $aconservationism 610 $acorporate social responsibility 610 $adecentralization 610 $adevelopment policy 610 $aEcuador 610 $aexport horticulture 610 $afood systems 610 $aforest land governance 610 $aformal and informal rules and regulations 610 $agender 610 $agreen energy 610 $aholistic management 610 $aidentity 610 $ainstitution shopping 610 $ainstitutional change 610 $ainstitutions 610 $aLaikipia County 610 $aland 610 $aland concessions 610 $aland grabbing 610 $aland tenure transformations 610 $alarge scale land acquisitions 610 $alarge-scale land acquisitions 610 $aMau Forest 610 $an/a 610 $aOgiek 610 $apastoral resilience 610 $aprotected areas 610 $aqualitative 610 $aresilience 610 $aresilience and commons grabbing 610 $aresilience, social anthropology 610 $asocial anthropology 610 $aSoutheast Asia 610 $asustainable energy 610 $awater 610 $awater-shed management plan 615 7$aHistory 615 7$aSocial and cultural anthropology 615 7$aSocial and ethical issues 700 $aHaller$b Tobias$4edt$01140044 702 $aKa?ser$b Fabian$4edt 702 $aNgutu$b Mariah$4edt 702 $aHaller$b Tobias$4oth 702 $aKa?ser$b Fabian$4oth 702 $aNgutu$b Mariah$4oth 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910557136103321 996 $aDoes Commons Grabbing Lead to Resilience Grabbing$93036016 997 $aUNINA