LEADER 03825 am 2200841 n 450 001 9910552973803321 005 20210421 010 $a2-36781-406-6 024 7 $a10.4000/books.pulm.13580 035 $a(CKB)4100000012773905 035 $a(FrMaCLE)OB-pulm-13580 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/86303 035 $a(PPN)261977385 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000012773905 100 $a20220325j|||||||| ||| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $auu||||||m|||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aModernism and Unreadability /$fIsabelle Alfandary, Axel Nesme 210 $aMontpellier $cPresses universitaires de la Méditerranée$d2021 215 $a1 online resource (271 p.) 225 1 $aHorizons anglophones 311 $a2-84269-929-7 330 $aQuestioning ?Modernism and Unreadability? means exploring Modernism from the perspective of one of its most problematic effects: unreadability. Modernism is approached through the lens of texts known to be particularly resistant to interpretation-? borderline? modernist texts which fall de facto under the category of the unreadable, i.e., texts which need to be ?unraveled? (Barthes) rather than deciphered. Those texts, now part of the literary canon, raise problems of deciphering/comprehension which defer and displace the question of interpretation. From Stein to Eliot, several canonical texts foil reading, articulation, and commentary. Given its intensity, we need to ask ourselves to what extent modernist unreadability defines a unique historical moment. This latter hypothesis underwrites a polemical notion of literary history as a succession of breaks made manifest by the emergence of radically new paradigms-such as unreadability- through which Modernist writings question literariness from the angle of literalness, and challenge literature-both as a practice and as a historical institution-to account for itself, to justify its procedures and its tacitly or implicitly held beliefs, to deconstruct the very meaning of writing and reading. 606 $aLiterature (General) 606 $ahermeneutics 606 $aModernism 606 $aunreadability 606 $aliterary 606 $amisreading 606 $awreaderly textuality 610 $ahermeneutics 610 $aModernism 610 $aunreadability 610 $aliterary 610 $amisreading 610 $awreaderly textuality 615 4$aLiterature (General) 615 4$ahermeneutics 615 4$aModernism 615 4$aunreadability 615 4$aliterary 615 4$amisreading 615 4$awreaderly textuality 700 $aAlfandary$b Isabelle$0996826 701 $aBéja$b Alice$01325016 701 $aBroqua$b Vincent$01325017 701 $aBucher$b Vincent$01290585 701 $aCazé$b Antoine$01294243 701 $aCostello$b Bonnie$01176720 701 $aDelourme$b Chantal$01320746 701 $aDucroux$b Amélie$01283951 701 $aDuplay$b Mathieu$01322518 701 $aGarnier$b Marie-Dominique$01286387 701 $aKalck$b Xavier$01283498 701 $aLamiot Enos$b Christophe$01325018 701 $aLang$b Abigail$01288950 701 $aLatham$b Monica$01325019 701 $aNesme$b Axel$01324597 701 $aPerquin$b Jean-Charles$01325020 701 $aReynes-Delobel$b Anne$01289369 701 $aSavinel$b Christine$01283502 701 $aSchmidt$b Michael$0167727 701 $aWedell$b Noura$01308667 701 $aAlfandary$b Isabelle$0996826 701 $aNesme$b Axel$01324597 801 0$bFR-FrMaCLE 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910552973803321 996 $aModernism and Unreadability$93036499 997 $aUNINA