LEADER 03899nam 22005535 450 001 9910548176603321 005 20251202150938.0 010 $a9783030897505$b(electronic bk.) 010 $z9783030897499 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-89750-5 035 $a(PPN)275891399 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6897060 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6897060 035 $a(CKB)21325627200041 035 $a(BIP)83380945 035 $a(BIP)81700622 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-89750-5 035 $a(EXLCZ)9921325627200041 100 $a20220225d2022 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAcademic Skepticism in Hume and Kant $eA Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics /$fby Catalina González Quintero 205 $a1st ed. 2022. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2022. 215 $a1 online resource (281 pages) 225 1 $aSynthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,$x2542-8292 ;$v449 311 08$aPrint version: González Quintero, Catalina Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 9783030897499 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. The Skepticism of the New Academy: From Epoche to Persuasion -- 3. Academic Skepticism and Metaphysics: On the Gods and the Immortal Soul -- 4. Hume's Academic Skepticism: A Normative Theory of Belief -- 5. Hume and Cicereo on Metaphysics: Philo's Non-dogmatic Deism -- 6. Skepticism vs. Skeptical Method: Sources of Ancient and Modern Skepticism in Kant -- 7. Kant?s Critical Solution to the Antinomies as an Academic Response to the Apraxia Objection -- 8. Conclusion. 330 $aThis book offers an unprecedented study of the influence of the skepticism of the New Platonic Academy on David Hume?s and Immanuel Kant?s critiques of metaphysics. By demonstrating how the skeptical teachings of the Academy affected these authors? Enlightened attacks on traditional metaphysics, this book deepens and broadens the burgeoning scholarship on the role that the Ancients schools of skepticism played in the configuration of Modern skeptical outlooks. It bolsters the newfound recognition that we must reconsider the conventional view that the revival of Pyrrhonism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gave birth to Modern skepticism by incorporating the influence of Academic skepticism in the analysis. Giving a new impetus to this line of research, the author argues that Academic ideas and methods informed Hume?s and Kant?s critique of metaphysics in substantial and thus far unacknowledged ways. Specifically, she demonstrates the centrality of Academic skepticismto Hume?s epistemology and critique of religion through a detailed analysis of his theory of belief in the Treatise and the first Enquiry as well as of its application in the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Likewise, her analysis reveals how Kant?s anti-metaphysical stance, developed in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason, contains many skeptical insights of Academic inspiration, bequeathed to him by Hume. 410 0$aSynthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,$x2542-8292 ;$v449 606 $aPhilosophy$xHistory 606 $aScience$xHistory 606 $aHistory of Philosophy 606 $aHistory of Science 615 0$aPhilosophy$xHistory. 615 0$aScience$xHistory. 615 14$aHistory of Philosophy. 615 24$aHistory of Science. 676 $a149.73 700 $aGonza?lez Quintero$b Catalina$01208939 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 912 $a9910548176603321 996 $aAcademic Skepticism in Hume and Kant$92789084 997 $aUNINA