LEADER 04504nim 2200421Ka 450 001 9910151959803321 005 20250814103520.9 010 $a1-5094-2174-2 035 $a(CKB)3710000000953577 035 $a(ODN)ODN0003210865 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000953577 100 $a20191027d2016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $auruna---||||| 181 $cspw$2rdacontent 182 $cs$2rdamedia 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aNazi germany's rocket science $eThe history of the third reich's experimental weapons technology and research during world war ii. /$fCharles River Editors 205 $aUnabridged. 210 $aSolon $cCharles River Editors$d2016 215 $a1 online resource (2 audio files) $cdigital 300 $aUnabridged. 330 $aAfter the last shots of World War II were fired and the process of rebuilding Germany and Europe began, the Western Allies and the Soviet Union each tried to obtain the services of the Third Reich's leading scientists, especially those involved in rocketry, missile technology, and aerospace research. Naturally, this was a delicate affair due to the fact many of the German scientists were not only active Nazis but had helped the Nazi war machine terrorize the world. At the same time, by the late war period, the Anglo-American Allies formed a clear picture of the Soviet state. Though forced to ally with the USSR's dictator, Josef Stalin, the West came to understand Communist Russia represented yet another hungry totalitarian power, and thus a very real threat to an independent Europe. Both the Western Allies and the Soviets knew of Adolf Hitler's V-2 rocket program, the forerunner of ballistic missiles and the space race. Each recognized the immense strategic value of these technologies and wished to secure their benefits for themselves. As the Soviets contemplated additional expansion following the "Great Patriotic War" and the U.S. military came to understand the putative allies of today would emerge as the enemies of tomorrow, the men possessing knowledge of the V-2 rockets and other Third Reich military technology programs became seen as crucial pieces in the incipient NATO versus Warsaw Pact standoff. The result was the American-led "Operation Paperclip" on the Western side, which resulted in German scientists putting their expertise at the disposal of the U.S. and other NATO members. Operation Paperclip aimed not only to obtain the benefits of German scientific advances for the United States but also to deny them to the potentially hostile Soviets. The Western approach, however self-interested, typically met with voluntary compliance on the German scientists' parts. In contrast, the Soviet answer to Paperclip, Operation Osoaviakhim, used the implied threat of imprisonment, torture, and death, the characteristic tools of Stalinist Russia, to coerce assistance from German scientists and engineers following the war. These men yielded rich dividends to the Soviet state in terms of achieving at least temporary technical parity with the USSR's western rivals. To say Operation Paperclip had a profound impact on the Cold War and American history would be an understatement. The most well known example of the operation's "success" is Wernher von Braun, who was once a member of a branch of the SS involved in the Holocaust, would become known as the "father of rocket science" and fascinate the world with visions of winged rockets and space stations as a "new" Manhattan Project, one that NASA would eventually adopt. And in addition to the weaponization of ballistic missiles that progressed throughout the Cold War, von Braun's expertise was used for America's most historic space missions. Nazi Germany's Rocket Science: The History of the Third Reich's Experimental Weapons Technology and Research during World War II analyzes the Nazis' technological advances and the covert attempts to import Nazi scientists after the fall of the Third Reich. 517 $aNazi Germany's Rocket Science 606 $aNonfiction$2OverDrive 606 $aHistory$2OverDrive 606 $aMilitary$2OverDrive 615 17$aNonfiction. 615 7$aHistory. 615 7$aMilitary. 686 $aHIS014000$aHIS027100$aHIS037070$2bisacsh 700 $aEditors$b Charles River$01843297 701 $aFluxman$b Colin$01843300 906 $aAUDIO 912 $a9910151959803321 996 $aNazi germany's rocket science$94426644 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03297nam 22007093 450 001 9910547691103321 005 20231030121254.0 010 $a9783839457795 010 $a3839457793 024 7 $a10.1515/9783839457795 035 $a(CKB)5590000000881908 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6956346 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6956346 035 $a(DE-B1597)612855 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783839457795 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/78650 035 $a(ScCtBLL)e0d5f396-d1e6-4aab-a2ef-7194c9e17959 035 $a(Perlego)3053032 035 $a(oapen)doab78650 035 $a(DE-B1597)BR1265189 035 $z(OCoLC)1296692751 035 $a(oapen)78650 035 $a(EXLCZ)995590000000881908 100 $a20220425d2021 uy 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDenkmalpflege zwischen System und Gesellschaft $eVielfalt denkmalpflegerischer Prozesse in der DDR (1952-1975) 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aBielefeld$ctranscript Verlag$d2021 210 1$aBielefeld :$ctranscript,$d2021. 210 4$d©2021. 215 $a1 online resource (427 pages) 225 1 $aPublic History - Angewandte Geschichte 311 08$a9783837657791 311 08$a3837657795 327 $aCover -- Inhalt -- Untitled -- 1. Einleitung -- 2. Prolog: Die Debatte um das Berliner Schloss -- 3. Denkmalpflege im (Wieder-)Aufbau 1952-1960 -- 4. Zwischenfazit zum ersten Untersuchungszeitraum 1952-1960 -- 5. Denkmalpflege und sozialistische Umgestaltung 1961-1975 -- 6. Zwischenfazit zum zweiten Untersuchungszeitraum 1961-1975 -- 7. Resümee -- Verzeichnisse -- Anhang I: Zeitzeugengespräch mit Ludwig Deiters -- Anhang II: Personenübersicht. 330 $aDenkmalpflege und -schutz befanden sich in der DDR in einem Gefüge divergierender Interessen, die es wiederholt auszuhandeln galt.Franziska Klemstein präsentiert ein differenziertes Bild denkmalpflegerischer Denk- und Arbeitsweisen sowie regionale Unterschiede im Zeitraum von 1952 bis 1975. Sie veranschaulicht das Handlungsgefüge der institutionellen Denkmalpflege im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kultur und Bauwesen und rückt exemplarisch Handlungsmöglichkeiten und die Auswirkungen konkreter Entscheidungen ausgewählter Akteur*innen wie Ludwig Deiters, Fritz Rothstein und Käthe Rieck ins Zentrum der Untersuchung. 410 0$aPublic History - Angewandte Geschichte 606 $aHISTORY / Europe / Germany$2bisacsh 610 $aArchitecture. 610 $aArt. 610 $aCultural History. 610 $aGDR (East Germany). 610 $aGerman History. 610 $aHeritage Conservation. 610 $aHistorical Preservation. 610 $aHistory of the 20th Century. 610 $aHistory. 610 $aMemory Culture. 615 7$aHISTORY / Europe / Germany. 700 $aKlemstein$b Franziska$01221299 712 02$aFriedrich-Naumann-Stiftung fu?r die Freiheit,$4fnd$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fnd 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910547691103321 996 $aDenkmalpflege zwischen System und Gesellschaft$92832148 997 $aUNINA