LEADER 03585oam 22006374a 450 001 9910524866303321 005 20251104142925.0 010 $a0-8018-0046-3 010 $a1-4214-3560-8 035 $a(CKB)4100000010460844 035 $a(OCoLC)1090987055 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse78503 035 $a(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88963 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC29139156 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL29139156 035 $a(oapen)doab88963 035 $a(OCoLC)1526863293 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000010460844 100 $a20711223d1962 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|||||||nn|n 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Road to Normalcy$eThe Presidential Campaign and Election of 1920 205 $a1st ed. 210 $cJohns Hopkins University Press 215 $a1 online resource (1 online resource (206 pages)) 225 0 $aThe Johns Hopkins University studies in historical and political science. Series 80,$vno. 1 300 $aOriginally published in 1962 311 08$a1-4214-3562-4 311 08$a1-4214-3561-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 330 $aOriginally published in 1962. In The Road to Normalcy, Wesley M. Bagby explains how the election of 1920 contributed to momentous shifts in American politics by detailing why the major political parties abandoned sentiments that were widely accepted several years prior to the election. Prior to World War I, two significant streams of progressivism maintained center stage in American politics?the Progressive movement and the world peace movement. The war proved not to be prohibitively distracting for the Progressive movement, which carried on well into the war years. But the war also introduced new elements into American political life, such as the restriction of free speech, popular outbursts of intolerance and hatred encouraged by war propaganda, and a belief in the necessity and efficacy of violence. Many of these elements eroded the ideals undergirding the Progressive movement. The international peace movement reflected the spirit of idealistic internationalism that characterized the tenor of American foreign policy from the beginning to the end of the war. However, the election of 1920, the first presidential election after World War I, addressed the question of whether America would resume its progressive efforts at home and abroad following the war. The election ultimately stymied both political currents, proving to be an end for both the Progressive movement and the world peace movement. 410 0$aJohns Hopkins University studies in historical and political science ;$v80th ser., 1. 606 $aPresidents$zUnited States$xElection$y1920 606 $aDemocratie$zE?tats-Unis$2ram 606 $aPresidents$zE?tats-Unis$xE?lection (1920)$2ram 606 $aWahl$2gnd$3(DE-588)4064286-0 606 $aPresidents$xElection$2fast$3(OCoLC)fst01075747 607 $aUnited States$xPolitique et gouvernement$y1913-1921$2ram 607 $aUnited States$2fast 608 $aProject Muse. 615 0$aPresidents$xElection 615 0$aDemocratie 615 0$aPresidents$xE?lection (1920) 615 7$aWahl. 615 0$aPresidents$xElection. 676 $a973.913 700 $aBagby$b Wesley M$g(Wesley Marvin),$f1922-2002,$01115793 801 0$bMdBmJHUP 801 1$bMdBmJHUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910524866303321 996 $aThe Road to Normalcy$92642848 997 $aUNINA