LEADER 03432oam 22005052 450 001 9910511764103321 005 20200901152017.0 010 $a90-04-37551-1 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004375512 035 $a(CKB)4970000000170213 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5842978 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004375512 035 $a(EXLCZ)994970000000170213 100 $a20181127d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aConsensus-based interpretation of regional human rights treaties /$fby Francisco Pascual-Vives 210 1$aLeiden ;$aBoston :$cBrill Nijhoff,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (308 pages) 225 1 $aInternational studies in human rights ;$vvolume 129 311 $a90-04-37552-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aFront Matter -- -- -- Foreword -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- Theoretical Framework: Consensus, Sectorialization and Subsidiarity -- The Notion of Consensus in Public International Law -- The Challenges Arising from the Specialization and Sectoralization of Public International Law -- Subsidiarity as a General Principle in International Human Rights Law -- Consensus and Evolutive Interpretation -- Evolutive Interpretation as a Method of Interpretation in Public International Law -- The Evolution of Regional Human Rights Treaties through the Notion of Consensus -- Consensus and the National Margin of Appreciation -- Scope of the National Margin of Appreciation -- Intrinsic Circumstances Conditioning the National Margin of Appreciation -- Consensus as an Extrinsic Circumstance Conditioning the National Margin of Appreciation -- Final Considerations -- Back Matter -- Bibliography -- Table of Jurisprudence and Case Law -- Table of International Treaties -- Table of Authors. 330 $aIn Consensus-Based Interpretation of Regional Human Rights Treaties Francisco Pascual-Vives examines the central role played by the notion of consensus in the case law of the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights. As many other international courts and tribunals do, both regional human rights courts resort to this concept while undertaking an evolutive interpretation of the Rome Convention and the Pact of San José, respectively. The role exerted by the notion of consensus in this framework can be used not only to understand the evolving character of the rights and freedoms recognized by these international treaties, but also to reaffirm the international nature of these regional human rights courts. 410 0$aInternational Studies in Human Rights$v129. 606 $aInternational human rights courts 606 $aInternational and municipal law 606 $aInternational law and human rights 606 $aRegionalism (International organization) 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aInternational human rights courts. 615 0$aInternational and municipal law. 615 0$aInternational law and human rights. 615 0$aRegionalism (International organization) 676 $a341.48026 700 $aPascual Vives$b Francisco Jose?$01067219 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910511764103321 996 $aConsensus-based interpretation of regional human rights treaties$92550716 997 $aUNINA