LEADER 03556nam 2200601 450 001 9910511760303321 005 20170919024740.0 010 $a90-04-31031-2 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004310315 035 $a(CKB)3710000000569757 035 $a(EBL)4355990 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001600909 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16308491 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001600909 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14837550 035 $a(PQKB)10924313 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16222638 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14837566 035 $a(PQKB)22902002 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4355990 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004310315 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000569757 100 $a20160213h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDivine causality and human free choice $eDomingo Ba?n?ez, physical premotion, and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited /$fRobert Joseph Matava 210 1$aLeiden, Netherlands ;$aBoston, Massachusetts :$cBrill,$d2016. 210 4$d©2016 215 $a1 online resource (377 p.) 225 1 $aBrill's Studies in Intellectual History,$x0920-8607 ;$vVolume 252 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-31030-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tPreliminary Material /$rR.J. Matava -- $tPrologue /$rR.J. Matava -- $t1 An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis /$rR.J. Matava -- $t2 Domingo Báñez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice /$rR.J. Matava -- $t3 Domingo Báñez?s Critique of Molina /$rR.J. Matava -- $t4 Luis de Molina?s Critique of Báñez /$rR.J. Matava -- $t5 Physical Premotion or Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan /$rR.J. Matava -- $t6 Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas /$rR.J. Matava -- $t7 God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense /$rR.J. Matava -- $tEpilogue /$rR.J. Matava -- $tSelect Bibliography /$rR.J. Matava -- $tIndex /$rR.J. Matava. 330 $aIn Divine Causality and Human Free Choice , R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Báñez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Báñez?s relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Báñez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas. 410 0$aBrill's studies in intellectual history ;$vVolume 252. 606 $aFree will and determinism$xReligious aspects$xCatholic Church 606 $aMolinism 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aFree will and determinism$xReligious aspects$xCatholic Church. 615 0$aMolinism. 676 $a233/.7 700 $aMatava$b Robert Joseph$01067200 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910511760303321 996 $aDivine causality and human free choice$92550681 997 $aUNINA