LEADER 03466nam  2200625Ia 450 
001 9910511507203321
005 20230213212143.0
010   $a90-272-2871-X
010   $a90-272-8639-6
010   $a9786613093035
010   $a1-283-09303-0
035   $a(CKB)2550000000033003
035   $a(EBL)680950
035   $a(OCoLC)714568545
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000537769
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11344974
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000537769
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10557145
035   $a(PQKB)11457868
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC680950
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000033003
100   $a19860115d1985      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aIconicity in syntax $eproceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June 24-6, 1983 /$fedited by John Haiman
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins$d1985
215   $a1 online resource (411 p.)
225 1 $aTypological studies in language,$x0167-7373 ;$vv. 6
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-272-2872-8 
311   $a0-915027-31-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographies and indexes.
327   $aICONICITY IN SYNTAX; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; INTRODUCTION; PART I: MOTIVATION; DIAGRAMMATIC ICONICITY IN STEM-INFLECTION RELATIONS; TEMPORAL SEQUENCE AND CHINESE WORD ORDER; SYMMETRY; THE INHERENT ICONISM OF INTONATION; OBSERVATIONS AND SPECULATIONS ON SUBJECTIVITY; THE ICONICITY OF THE UNIVERSAL CATEGORIES 'NOUN' AND 'VERBS'; PART II: ISOMORPHISM AND AUTOMORPHISM; ICONICITY, ISOMORPHISM AND NON-ARBITRARY CODING IN SYNTAX; THE CHILD AS LINGUISTIC ICON-MAKER; ICONICITY AND GRAMMATICAL MEANING
327   $aSOME ICONIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PLACE, TIME, AND DISCOURSE DEIXISCONDITIONAL MARKERS; PART III: COMPETING MOTIVATIONS; OATS AND WHEAT: THE FALLACY OF ARBITRARINESS; COMPETING MOTIVATIONS; THE ANALYIS-SYNTHESIS-LEXIS CYCLE IN TIBETO-BURMAN: A CASE STUDY IN MOTIVATED CHANGE; INDEX OF LANGUAGES; INDEX OF NAMES (excluding self-citation); INDEX OF TOPICS; The series Typological Studies in Language
330   $aThe papers in this volume all explore one kind of functional explanation for various aspects of linguistic form - iconicity: linguistic forms are frequently the way they are because they resemble the conceptual structures they are used to convey, or, linguistic structures resemble each other because the different conceptual domains they represent are thought of in the same way. The papers in Part I of this volume deal with aspects of motivation, the ways in which the linguistic form is a diagram of conceptual structure, and homologous with it in interesting ways. Most of the papers in Part II 
410  0$aTypological studies in language ;$vv. 6.
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$vCongresses
606   $aLinguistic analysis (Linguistics)$vCongresses
606   $aLinguistic universals$vCongresses
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general
615  0$aLinguistic analysis (Linguistics)
615  0$aLinguistic universals
676   $a415
701   $aHaiman$b John$0168895
712 12$aSymposium on Iconicity in Syntax
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910511507203321
996   $aIconicity in syntax$92551945
997   $aUNINA