LEADER 02856oam 22004932 450 001 9910511377303321 005 20190424171100.0 010 $a90-04-39585-7 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004395855 035 $a(CKB)4970000000170222 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5842530 035 $a(OCoLC)1099545758 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004395855 035 $a(EXLCZ)994970000000170222 100 $a20190424d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aNeutrality as a policy choice for small/weak democracies $elearning from the Belgian experience /$fby Michael F. Palo 210 1$aLeiden Boston :$cBrill | Nijhoff,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (598 pages) 311 $a90-04-37184-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront Matter -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Preface -- Abbreviations -- Maps -- Introduction: Objectives and Methodology -- A Counterfactual Analysis of the Regime of Permanent Neutrality, 1839?1914 -- An Integrated Level Analysis of Belgian Foreign and Security Policies, 1914?1936 -- An Integrated Level Analysis of the Regime of Voluntary Neutrality, October 1936 and May 1940 -- An Integrated Level Analysis of the Impact of World War ii on Belgian Foreign Policy and Internal Politics -- Small Democratic States in the International System -- Conclusions -- Back Matter -- Bibliography -- Index. 330 $aIn Neutrality as a Policy Choice for Small/Weak Democracies: Learning from the Belgian Experience, Michael F. Palo has three main objectives. First, he employs a counterfactual approach to examine the hypothesis that had permanent neutrality not been imposed on Belgium in 1839, it would have pursued neutrality anyway until war broke out in 1914. Secondly, he analyses why, after abandoning obligatory neutrality during World War I, the Belgians adopted voluntary neutrality in October 1936. Finally, he seeks to use the historical Belgian case study to test specific International Relations? Theories and to contribute to Small State Studies, especially the behaviour of small/weak democracies in the international system. 606 $aNeutrality$zBelgium 606 $aDemocracy$zBelgium 606 $aWorld War, 1914-1918$zBelgium$xInfluence 606 $aWorld War, 1939-1945$zBelgium$xInfluence 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aNeutrality 615 0$aDemocracy 615 0$aWorld War, 1914-1918$xInfluence. 615 0$aWorld War, 1939-1945$xInfluence 676 $a341.6/4 700 $aPalo$b Michael F.$01066337 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910511377303321 996 $aNeutrality as a policy choice for small$92549022 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03831nam 2200577 450 001 9910814031303321 005 20200923020339.0 010 $a0-88755-543-8 010 $a0-88755-545-4 024 7 $a10.1515/9780887555459 035 $a(CKB)4340000000261169 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5323684 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11526484 035 $a(OCoLC)1029497473 035 $a(VaAlCD)20.500.12592/32m8bx 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5323684 035 $a(DE-B1597)664708 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780887555459 035 $a(PPN)257545085 035 $a(EXLCZ)994340000000261169 100 $a20180411h20182018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aReport of an inquiry into an injustice $eBegade Shutagot'ine and the Sahtu treaty /$fPeter Keith Kulchyski 210 1$aWennipeg, Manitoba, Canada :$cUniversity of Manitoba Press,$d2018. 210 4$dİ2018 215 $a1 online resource (347 pages) $cillustrations, maps, photographs 225 1 $aContemporary Studies on the North,$x1928-1722 ;$v5 311 $a0-88755-813-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aOpening brief. Concerning Begade Shutagot'ine land rights -- Deposition one. Tulita -- Deposition two. Caribou Flats -- Deposition three. Drum Lake -- Deposition four. Stewart Lake -- Closing brief. Love letter to section 25 of the Canadian Constitution. 330 $a"A Report of an Inquiry into an Injustice chronicles Peter Kulchyski's experiences with the Begade Shuhtagot'ine, a small community of a few hundred people living in and around Tulita (formerly Fort Norman), on the Mackenzie River in the heart of Canada's Northwest Territories. Despite their formal objections and boycott of the agreement, the band and their lands were included in the Sahtu treaty, a modern comprehensive land claims agreement negotiated between the Government of Canada and the Sahtu Tribal Council, representing Dene and Metis peoples of the region. While both Treaty Eleven (1921) and the Sahtu Treaty (1994) purport to extinguish Begade Shuhtagot'ine Aboriginal title, oral history and documented attempts to exclude themselves from treaty strongly challenge the validity of that extinguishment. Structured as a series of briefs to an inquiry into the Begade Shutagot'ine's claim, this manuscript documents the negotiation and implementation of the Sahtu treaty and amasses evidence of historical and continued presence and land use to make eminently clear that the Begade Shuhtagot'ine are the continued owners of the land by law: they have not extinguished title to their traditional territories; they continue to exercise their customs, practices, and traditions on those territories; and they have a fundamental right to be consulted on, and refuse or be compensated for, development projects on those territories. Kulchyski bears eloquent witness to the Begade Shuhtagot'ine people's two-decade struggle for land rights, which have been blatantly ignored by federal and territorial authorities for too long."--$cProvided by publisher. 410 0$aContemporary studies on the North ;$v5. 606 $aChipewyan Indians$zNorthwest Territories$zSahtu Region$xClaims 606 $aMe?tis$zNorthwest Territories$zSahtu Region$xClaims 606 $aChipewyan Indians$zCanada$xGovernment relations 615 0$aChipewyan Indians$xClaims. 615 0$aMe?tis$xClaims. 615 0$aChipewyan Indians$xGovernment relations. 676 $a305.8972071 700 $aKulchyski$b Peter Keith$01472908 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910814031303321 996 $aReport of an inquiry into an injustice$93995125 997 $aUNINA