LEADER 04130nam 22006615 450 001 9910496148403321 005 20230828201346.0 010 $a9780520922228 010 $a0520922220 010 $a9780585277097 010 $a0585277095 024 7 $a10.1525/9780520922228 035 $a(CKB)111004366722886 035 $a(MH)008147883-6 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000100306 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12033184 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000100306 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10036688 035 $a(PQKB)11642477 035 $a(DE-B1597)543279 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780520922228 035 $a(OCoLC)1153522386 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC30495601 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL30495601 035 $a(OCoLC)1377818399 035 $a(Perlego)4433080 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111004366722886 100 $a20200424h19991999 fg 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||#|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAgent-centered morality $ean Aristotelian alternative to Kantian internalism /$fGeorge W. Harris 205 $aReprint 2019 210 1$aBerkeley, CA :$cUniversity of California Press,$d[1999] 210 4$dİ1999 215 $a1 online resource (xi, 434 p. ) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 08$a9780520216907 311 08$a0520216903 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 419-426) and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tPreface --$t1. The Internalism Requirement and the Integration Test --$t2. Impartiality, Regulative Norms, and Practical Reason --$t3. The Thin Conception of Integrity and the Integration Test --$t4. An Integrity-Sensitive Conception of Human Agency, Practical Reason, and Morality --$t5. General Features and Varieties of Respect --$t6. Respect, Egoism, and Self-Assessment --$t7. The Categorical Value of the Goods of Respect --$t8. General Features of Love --$t9. The Normative Thoughts of Parental Love, Part I. --$t10. The Normative Thoughts of Parental Love, Part II. --$t11. Peer Love --$t12. The Normative Thoughts of Friendship --$t13. The Normative Thoughts of Neighborly Love, Part I. --$t14. The Normative Thoughts of Neighborly Love, Part II. --$t15. Loneliness, Intimacy, and the Integration Test --$t16. Solitary Activities --$t17. Shared Activities --$t18. Normative Thoughts and the Goods of Activity --$tBibliography --$tIndex 330 $aWhat kinds of persons do we aspire to be, and how do our aspirations fit with our ideas of rationality? In Agent-Centered Morality, George Harris argues that most of us aspire to a certain sort of integrity: We wish to be respectful of and sympathetic to others, and to be loving parents, friends, and members of our communities. Against a prevailing Kantian consensus, Harris offers an Aristotelian view of the problems presented by practical reason, problems of integrating all our concerns into a coherent, meaningful life in a way that preserves our integrity. The task of solving these problems is "the integration test." Systematically addressing the work of major Kantian thinkers, Harris shows that even the most advanced contemporary versions of the Kantian view fail to integrate all of the values that correspond to what we call a moral life. By demonstrating how the meaning of life and practical reason are internally related, he constructs from Aristotle's thought a conceptual scheme that successfully integrates all the characteristics that make a life meaningful, without jeopardizing the place of any. Harris's elucidation of this approach is a major contribution to debates on human agency, practical reason, and morality. 606 $aEthics 606 $aAgent (Philosophy) 606 $aEthics 615 0$aEthics. 615 0$aAgent (Philosophy) 615 0$aEthics 676 $a171/.3 700 $aHarris$b George W.$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0109453 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910496148403321 996 $aAgent-Centered Morality$92866386 997 $aUNINA