LEADER 03171nam  2200589 a 450 
001 9910495878603321
005 20230421033305.0
010   $a0-520-91231-4
010   $a0-585-04385-X
024 7 $a10.1525/9780520912311
035   $a(CKB)111000211183360
035   $a(MH)002558386-7
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000230729
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12059982
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000230729
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10179248
035   $a(PQKB)10317635
035   $a(DE-B1597)569038
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780520912311
035   $a(OCoLC)1198930545
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC30771424
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL30771424
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111000211183360
100   $a19910827d1992      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur||#||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aPunishment $etheory and practice /$fMark Tunick$b[electronic resource]
205   $aReprint 2020
210   $aBerkeley $cUniversity of California Press$dc1992
215   $a1 online resource (ix, 211 p. )
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311 0 $a0-520-07737-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFront matter --$tContents --$tPreface --$t1. Introduction --$t2. Radical Criticisms of the Practice of Legal Punishment --$t3. Justifications of the Practice: Utilitarian and Retributive --$t4. Retributive Immanent Criticism of Legal Punishment --$t5. Immanent Criticism of an Essentially Contested Practice --$tAppendix --$tBibliography --$tIndex
330   $aWhat actions should be punished? Should plea-bargaining be allowed? How should sentencing be determined? In this original, penetrating study, Mark Tunick explores not only why society punishes wrongdoing, but also how it implements punishment.    Contending that the theory and practice of punishment are inherently linked, Tunick draws on a broad range of thinkers, from the radical criticisms of Nietzsche, Foucault, and some Marxist theorists through the sociological theories of Durkheim and Girard to various philosophical traditions and the "law and economics" movement. He defends punishment against its radical critics and offers a version of retribution, distinct from revenge, that holds that we punish not to deter or reform, but to mete out just deserts, vindicate right, and express society's righteous anger. Demonstrating first how this theory best accounts for how punishment is carried out, he then provides "immanent criticism" of certain features of our practice that don't accord with the retributive principle.    Thought-provoking and deftly argued, Punishment will garner attention and spark debate among political theorists, philosophers, legal scholars, sociologists, and criminologists.
606   $aPunishment
606   $aPunishment
615  0$aPunishment.
615  0$aPunishment
676   $a345/.077
676   $a342.577
700   $aTunick$b Mark$01207184
801  0$bDLC
801  1$bDLC
801  2$bMH-L
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910495878603321
996   $aPunishment$92862812
997   $aUNINA