LEADER 03842nam  22006735  450 
001 9910484789903321
005 20200919152521.0
010   $a3-319-01799-3
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-01799-0
035   $a(CKB)3710000000074702
035   $a(EBL)1593041
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001067519
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11602585
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001067519
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11092960
035   $a(PQKB)11651442
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1593041
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-01799-0
035   $a(PPN)176104852
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000074702
100   $a20131123d2014      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aHeuristic Strategies in the Speeches of Cicero /$fby Gábor Tahin
205   $a1st ed. 2014.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2014.
215   $a1 online resource (205 p.)
225 1 $aArgumentation Library,$x1566-7650 ;$v23
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-319-01798-5 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aForeword -- Acknowledgement -- Table of Contents -- Preface.- Chapter 1 Introduction: The Problem of Analysis -- Chapter 3 The Origins of Heuristic Argumentation: Probable Arguments in Ancient Rhetoric -- Chapter 4 Cicero?s Models: Heuristic Arguments in the Greek Orators -- Chapter 5 Pro Flacco -- Chapter 6  Pro Sulla.- Chapter 7 Pro Murena.- Chapter 8 Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino -- Chapter 9 Pro Milone -- Chapter 10 Pro Cluentio -- Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index.
330   $aThis book introduces a new form of argumentative analysis: rhetorical heuremes. The method applies the concepts of heuristic thinking, probability, and contingency in order to develop a better understanding of complex arguments in classical oratory. A new theory is required because Greek and Roman rhetoric cannot provide detailed answers to problems of strategic argumentation in the analysis of speeches. Building on scholarship in Ciceronian oratory, this book moves beyond the extant terminology and employs a concept of heuristic reasoning derived from the psychology of decision making and mathematical problem solving. The author analyses selected passages from Cicero?s forensic speeches where arguments of probability are deployed, and shows that the Sophistic concept of probability can link ancient rhetoric and modern theories of argumentation. Six groups of heuremes are identified, each of which represents a form of probabilistic reasoning by which the orator plays upon the perception of the jurors.
410  0$aArgumentation Library,$x1566-7650 ;$v23
606   $aLogic
606   $aPhilology
606   $aHistorical linguistics
606   $aPhilosophy, Ancient
606   $aLogic$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E16000
606   $aClassical Studies$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/728000
606   $aHistorical Linguistics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/N26000
606   $aClassical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E12000
615  0$aLogic.
615  0$aPhilology.
615  0$aHistorical linguistics.
615  0$aPhilosophy, Ancient.
615 14$aLogic.
615 24$aClassical Studies.
615 24$aHistorical Linguistics.
615 24$aClassical Philosophy.
676   $a160
700   $aTahin$b Gábor$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01228540
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910484789903321
996   $aHeuristic Strategies in the Speeches of Cicero$92852071
997   $aUNINA