LEADER 03672nam  22006615  450 
001 9910484579803321
005 20200919063831.0
010   $a94-017-7264-9
024 7 $a10.1007/978-94-017-7264-8
035   $a(CKB)3710000000437018
035   $a(EBL)2096191
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001524844
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11867192
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001524844
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11485772
035   $a(PQKB)11533098
035   $a(DE-He213)978-94-017-7264-8
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2096191
035   $a(PPN)186399928
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000437018
100   $a20150622d2015      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aDeath?s Values and Obligations: A Pragmatic Framework /$fby Dennis R. Cooley
205   $a1st ed. 2015.
210  1$aDordrecht :$cSpringer Netherlands :$cImprint: Springer,$d2015.
215   $a1 online resource (320 p.)
225 1 $aInternational Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine,$x1567-8008 ;$v62
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a94-017-7263-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aA Pragmatic Method -- A Pragmatic Framework of Values and Principles: The Beginning -- Defining and Valuing Properties and Individuals -- What harm does death do to the decedent? -- How should we feel about our own death? -- How should we feel about another?s death? -- Is there a duty to die? -- A duty to suicide.
330   $aThis book brings together the relevant interdisciplinary and method elements needed to form a conceptual framework that is both pragmatic and rigorous.  By using the best, and often the latest, work in thanatology, psychology, neuroscience, sociology, physics, philosophy and ethics, it develops a framework for understanding both what death is ? which requires a great deal of time spent developing definitions of the various types of identity-in-the-moment and identity-over-time ? and the values involved in death. This pragmatic framework answers questions about why death is a form of loss; why we experience the emotional reactions, feelings and desires that we do; which of these reactions, feelings and desires are justified and which are not; if we can survive death and how; whether our deaths can harm us; and why and how we should prepare for death. Thanks to the pragmatic framework employed, the answers to the various questions are more likely to be accurate and acceptable than those with less rigorous scholarly underpinnings or which deal with utopian worlds.  .
410  0$aInternational Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine,$x1567-8008 ;$v62
606   $aEthics
606   $aNeurosciences
606   $aHealth psychology
606   $aEthics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14000
606   $aNeurosciences$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/B18006
606   $aHealth Psychology$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Y12020
615  0$aEthics.
615  0$aNeurosciences.
615  0$aHealth psychology.
615 14$aEthics.
615 24$aNeurosciences.
615 24$aHealth Psychology.
676   $a179.7
700   $aCooley$b Dennis R$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0972149
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910484579803321
996   $aDeath?s Values and Obligations: A Pragmatic Framework$92210269
997   $aUNINA