LEADER 03946nam  22007215  450 
001 9910484149603321
005 20200920054511.0
010   $a3-319-08013-X
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-08013-0
035   $a(CKB)3710000000244763
035   $a(EBL)1968086
035   $a(OCoLC)893674604
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001354215
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11758999
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001354215
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11323556
035   $a(PQKB)10769204
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1968086
035   $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-08013-0
035   $a(PPN)181352907
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000244763
100   $a20140919d2014      u|         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMoral Strata $eAnother Approach to Reflective Equilibrium /$fby John R. Welch
205   $a1st ed. 2014.
210  1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2014.
215   $a1 online resource (212 p.)
225 1 $aTheory and Decision Library A:, Rational Choice in Practical Philosophy and Philosophy of Science,$x0921-3384 ;$v49
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-319-08012-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aPreface -- Chapter 1 Discursive Strata -- Chapter 2 Saving the Moral Phenomena -- Chapter 3 Comparative Decision Theory -- Chapter 4 Working with Moral Means -- Chapter 5 Securing Our Moral Ends -- Chapter 6 Remedies for Reflective Disequilibrium -- Index. .
330   $aThis volume recreates the received notion of reflective equilibrium. It reconfigures reflective equilibrium as both a cognitive ideal and a method for approximating this ideal. The ideal of reflective equilibrium is restructured using the concept of discursive strata, which are formed by sentences and differentiated by function. Sentences that perform the same kind of linguistic function constitute a stratum. The book shows how moral discourse can be analyzed into phenomenal, instrumental, and teleological strata, and the ideal of reflective equilibrium reworked in these terms. In addition, the work strengthens the method of reflective equilibrium by harnessing the resources of decision theory and inductive logic. It launches a comparative version of decision theory and employs this framework as a guide to moral theory choice. It also recruits quantitative inductive logic to inform a standard of inductive cogency. When used in tandem with comparative decision theory, this standard can aid in the effort to turn the undesirable condition of reflective disequilibrium into reflective equilibrium.
410  0$aTheory and Decision Library A:, Rational Choice in Practical Philosophy and Philosophy of Science,$x0921-3384 ;$v49
606   $aEthics
606   $aOperations research
606   $aDecision making
606   $aMathematics
606   $aSocial sciences
606   $aEthics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14000
606   $aOperations Research/Decision Theory$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/521000
606   $aMathematics in the Humanities and Social Sciences$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/M32000
615  0$aEthics.
615  0$aOperations research.
615  0$aDecision making.
615  0$aMathematics.
615  0$aSocial sciences.
615 14$aEthics.
615 24$aOperations Research/Decision Theory.
615 24$aMathematics in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
676   $a10
676   $a170
676   $a519
676   $a658.40301
700   $aWelch$b John R$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01225650
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910484149603321
996   $aMoral Strata$92845671
997   $aUNINA