LEADER 04365oam 2200517 450 001 9910484049503321 005 20210417023243.0 010 $a3-030-57189-0 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-57189-4 035 $a(CKB)4100000011528374 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6382129 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-57189-4 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011528374 100 $a20210417d2021 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aEuropean constitutional courts towards data retention laws /$fMarek Zubik, Jan Podkowik, Robert Rybski, editors 205 $a1st ed. 2021. 210 1$aCham, Switzerland :$cSpringer,$d[2021] 210 4$d©2021 215 $a1 online resource (X, 384 p. 1 illus.) 225 1 $aLaw, Governance and Technology Series ;$vVolume 45 311 $a3-030-57188-2 327 $aData Retention in Europe -- Data Retention in the European Union -- Freedom of Communication and Data Retention in Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights -- Data Retention in Judgments of National Constitutional Courts -- Data Retention in Austria -- Data Retention in Belgium -- Data Retention in Bulgaria -- Data Retention in Cyprus -- Data Retention in Czech Republic -- Data Retention in Germany -- Data Retention in Ireland -- Data Retention in Poland -- Data Retention in Portugal -- Data Retention in Romania -- Data Retention in Slovakia -- Data Retention in Slovenia -- Common European Standard of Data Retention Law in Europe -- Judicial Dialogue on Data Retention Laws Shaping Common European Standard of the Protection of Freedom of Communication in the Digital Age: Concluding Remarks. 330 $aThe book analyses the impact the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of EU Member States and the Court of Justice of the European Union has had on the perception of freedom of communications in the digital era with respect to these courts? judgments regarding regulating storage and access to telecommunications data (known as telecommunications data retention) from 2008 to 2017. To do so, it examines the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Ireland, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and Slovakia, i.e. those courts that have already ruled on domestic provisions regulating telecommunications data retention. Further, it investigates the judgments of the Court of Justice of European Union regarding directive 2006/24/EC regulating telecommunications data retention along with relevant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. As such, the book provides a comparative study of jurisprudence and national measures to implement the Data Retention Directive. Moreover, the book discusses whether our current understanding of protection of freedom of communications guaranteed by the constitutions of EU member states and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which was developed in the era of analogue communications, remains accurate in the era of digital technologies and mass surveillance (simultaneously applied by states and private corporations). In this context, the book reconstructs constitutional standards that currently apply in the EU towards data retention. This book presents a unique comparative analysis of all judgments concerning Directive 2006/24/EC, which can be used in the legislative process on the EU forum aimed at introducing new principles of data retention and by constitutional courts in the context of comparative argumentation. 410 0$aLaw, governance and technology series ;$vVolume 45. 606 $aPrivacy, Right of$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aRecords retention$xLaw and legislation$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aData protection$xLaw and legislation$zEuropean Union countries 615 0$aPrivacy, Right of 615 0$aRecords retention$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aData protection$xLaw and legislation 676 $a342.240858 702 $aRybski$b Robert 702 $aPodkowik$b Jan 702 $aZubik$b Marek 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bUtOrBLW 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910484049503321 996 $aEuropean constitutional courts towards data retention laws$92585200 997 $aUNINA