LEADER 03455nam 2200469 450 001 9910483996103321 005 20210330191024.0 010 $a3-030-66211-X 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-66211-0 035 $a(CKB)4100000011758317 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-66211-0 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6476924 035 $a(PPN)253859905 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011758317 100 $a20210330d2021 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn|008mamaa 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDeep energy retrofit - a guide for decision makers /$fAlexander Zhivov, Ru?diger Lohse 205 $a1st ed. 2021. 210 1$aCham, Switzerland :$cEBC :$cSpringer,$d[2021] 210 4$dİ2021 215 $a1 online resource (XXI, 84 p. 22 illus., 19 illus. in color.) 225 1 $aSpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology 311 $a3-030-66210-1 327 $aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Deep Energy Retrofit In Public Buildings -- Chapter 3. What Is Deep Energy Retrofit? -- Chapter 4. Deep Energy Retrofit vs Shallow Renovation -- Chapter 5. Major Renovation And Deep Energy Retrofit -- Chapter 6. Product Delivery Quality Assurance Process -- Chapter 7. How To Make Der Cost Effective? -- Chapter 8. Business Models For Der -- Chapter 9. Der Financing -- Chapter 10. Lessons Learned From Pilot Projects -- Chapter 11. Conclusions -- References -- Acronyms and Abbreviations. 330 $aMany governments worldwide are setting more stringent targets for reductions in energy use in government/public buildings. Buildings constructed more than 10 years ago account for a major share of energy used by the building stock. However, the funding and ?know-how? (applied knowledge) available for owner-directed energy retrofit projects has not kept pace with new requirements. With typical retrofit projects, reduction of energy use varies between 10 and 20%, while actual executed renovation projects show that energy use reduction can exceed 50%, and can cost-effectively achieve the Passive House standard or even approach net zero-energy status (EBC Annex 61 2017a, Hermelink and Müller 2010; NBI 2014; RICS 2013; Shonder and Nasseri 2015; Miller and Higgins 2015; Emmerich et al. 2011). Building energy efficiency (EE) ranks first in approaches with resource efficiency potential with a total resource benefit of approximately $700 billion until 2030. EE is by far the cheapest way to cut CO2 emissions (McKinsey 2011, IPCC 2007). However, according to an IEA study (IEA 2014a), more than 80% of savings potential in building sector remains untapped. Thus, the share of deployed EE in the building sector is lower than in the Industry, Transport, and Energy generation sectors. Estimates for the deep renovation potentials show: ?600-900bn investment potential, ?1000-1300bn savings potential, 70% energy-saving potential, and 90% CO2 reduction potential. 410 0$aSpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology. 606 $aBuildings$xEnergy conservation 615 0$aBuildings$xEnergy conservation. 676 $a696 700 $aZhivov$b Alexander M.$01228623 702 $aLohse$b Ru?diger 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910483996103321 996 $aDeep energy retrofit - a guide for decision makers$92852381 997 $aUNINA