LEADER 03725nam  22006375  450 
001 9910483845403321
005 20200919051403.0
010   $a81-322-1765-9
024 7 $a10.1007/978-81-322-1765-7
035   $a(CKB)3710000000107812
035   $a(EBL)1731503
035   $a(OCoLC)885122379
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001245087
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11719571
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001245087
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11322140
035   $a(PQKB)10776398
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1731503
035   $a(DE-He213)978-81-322-1765-7
035   $a(PPN)178778869
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000107812
100   $a20140502d2014      u|             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMyth and Rhetoric of the Turkish Model$b[electronic resource] $eExploring Developmental Alternatives /$fby Anita Sengupta
205   $a1st ed. 2014.
210  1$aNew Delhi :$cSpringer India :$cImprint: Springer,$d2014.
215   $a1 online resource (173 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a81-322-1764-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aPreface -- Chapter 1. Political Dynamics in Eurasia: Background and Context of the Turkish Model -- Chapter 2. What is the ?Turkish Model?? -- Chapter 3. Confronting the Past: Reclaiming Ottoman-Russian connections and the Ottoman legacy -- Chapter 4. Eurasianism or Neo-Ottomanism? The Neighborhood in Turkish Foreign Policy -- Chapter 5. The Central Asian Response to Models -- Chapter 6. The Turkish Model at Crossroads: A Conclusion -- Bibliography.
330   $aThe volume discusses what the Turkish Model, or Turkish Development Alternative, was and why it was promoted in the Central Asian republics immediately following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. It argues that the Turkish Model was a myth that transferred the ideal of a ''secular, democratic, liberal society'' as a model for the post Soviet Turkic world and in the process encouraged a ''Turkic" rhetoric that emphasized connection between the two regions based on a common ancestry. The volume begins with an understanding of the reality of the Model from a Turkish perspective and then goes on to examine whether the Turkic world as a "cultural-civilizational alternative" makes sense both from a historical as well as contemporary perspective. It concludes by looking at the re-emergence of the Model in the wake of the events in West Asia in early 2011 and examines how in the light of a search for options the Turkish Model is once again projected as viable.  .
606   $aInternational relations
606   $aEuropean Economic Community literature
606   $aPolitical philosophy
606   $aInternational Relations$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912000
606   $aEuropean Integration$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/W33010
606   $aPolitical Philosophy$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000
607   $aTurkey$xHistory$y1960-
607   $aTurkey$xSocial conditions$y1960-
615  0$aInternational relations.
615  0$aEuropean Economic Community literature.
615  0$aPolitical philosophy.
615 14$aInternational Relations.
615 24$aEuropean Integration.
615 24$aPolitical Philosophy.
676   $a956.104
700   $aSengupta$b Anita$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01058196
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910483845403321
996   $aMyth and Rhetoric of the Turkish Model$92850013
997   $aUNINA