LEADER 04287nam 22006735 450 001 9910483664203321 005 20200920111825.0 010 $a3-319-13902-9 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-13902-9 035 $a(CKB)3710000000359064 035 $a(EBL)1974488 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001452212 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11889967 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001452212 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11498456 035 $a(PQKB)10842042 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-13902-9 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1974488 035 $a(PPN)184494257 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000359064 100 $a20150213d2015 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aInternational Trade Agreements Before Domestic Courts$b[electronic resource] $eLessons from the EU and Brazilian Experiences /$fby Maria Angela Jardim de Santa Cruz Oliveira 205 $a1st ed. 2015. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2015. 215 $a1 online resource (219 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-319-13901-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters. 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. The Relations Between International Law and Domestic Courts -- 3. The Relations Between International Trade Agreements and Domestic Courts in Brazil -- 4. The Relations Between International Trade Agreements and Domestic Courts in the European Union -- 5. Comparing the Role of Domestic Courts in International Trade Agreements -- 6. Conclusion. 330 $aThis book addresses the role of domestic courts in the enforcement of international trade agreements by examining the experiences of Brazilian and the European Union courts. This comparative study analyzes the differences, similarities and consequences of Brazilian and European courts? decisions in relation to the WTO agreements, which have ?direct effect? in Latin American emerging economies, but not in the European Union or other developed countries. It observes that domestic courts? enforcement of international trade agreements has had several unintended and counterproductive consequences, which were foreseeable in light of international scholarly debate on the direct effect of WTO agreements. It draws lessons from these jurisdictions? experiences and argues that the traditional academic literature that fosters domestic courts? enforcement of international law should be reconsidered in Latin America in relation to international trade agreements. This book defends the view that, as a result of their function and objectives together with the principles of popular sovereignty and democratic self-government, international trade agreements should not be considered to be self-executing or to have direct effect. This empirical work will be valuable to anyone interested in the effects of international trade rules at the domestic level and the role of domestic judges in international law.     . 606 $aPrivate international law 606 $aConflict of laws 606 $aComparative politics 606 $aLaw?Europe 606 $aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law $3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002 606 $aComparative Politics$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911040 606 $aEuropean Law$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R20000 615 0$aPrivate international law. 615 0$aConflict of laws. 615 0$aComparative politics. 615 0$aLaw?Europe. 615 14$aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . 615 24$aComparative Politics. 615 24$aEuropean Law. 676 $a320 676 $a340 676 $a340.2 676 $a340.9 676 $a382.9 700 $aJardim de Santa Cruz Oliveira$b Maria Angela$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01227622 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910483664203321 996 $aInternational Trade Agreements Before Domestic Courts$92850304 997 $aUNINA