LEADER 04242nam 22006375 450 001 9910483249703321 005 20251113175113.0 010 $a3-319-16148-2 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8 035 $a(CKB)3710000000394674 035 $a(EBL)2096776 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001501339 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11896717 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001501339 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11523233 035 $a(PQKB)10939547 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-319-16148-8 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2096776 035 $a(PPN)185489788 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3109272 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000394674 100 $a20150407d2015 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aArgument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation /$fedited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman 205 $a1st ed. 2015. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Springer,$d2015. 215 $a1 online resource (230 p.) 225 1 $aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x2215-0315 ;$v112 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a3-319-16147-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aIntroduction -- about the authors -- I. Argument Types or Fallacies? -- 1. Appeal to Expert Testimony ? A Bayesian Approach; Christian Dahlman and  Lena Wahlberg -- 2. Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility; Audrey Yap -- 3. On the Absence of Evidence; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument; Jose Juan Moreso -- 5. Institutional constraints of topical strategic maneuvering in legal argumentation. The case of ?insulting?;  Harm Kloosterhuis -- 6. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act; Janice Schuetz -- II. Argument Types and Legal Interpretation -- 7. Anti-Theoretical Claims about Legal Interpretation: The Argument behind the Fallacy; Thomas Bustamante -- 8. Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest;  Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 9. Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds; Micha? Araszkiewicz -- 10. An Analysis of some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Law; Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 11. Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions;  Eveline Feteris -- 12. Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: Between Cass Sunstein?s Minimalism, Richard Posner?s Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin?s Advocacy of Integrity; Bernardo Gonçalves Fernandes.- Index. 330 $aThis book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task. 410 0$aLaw and Philosophy Library,$x2215-0315 ;$v112 606 $aLaw$xPhilosophy 606 $aLaw$xHistory 606 $aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 606 $aPhilosophy of Law 615 0$aLaw$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aLaw$xHistory. 615 14$aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. 615 24$aPhilosophy of Law. 676 $a345.075 702 $aBustamante$b Thomas da Rosa de$f1976-$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aDahlman$b Christian$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910483249703321 996 $aArgument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation$92854359 997 $aUNINA