LEADER 03395nam 22006495 450 001 9910483152803321 005 20251113181129.0 010 $a9783030460167 010 $a3030460169 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-46016-7 035 $a(CKB)4100000011891471 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6564188 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL6564188 035 $a(OCoLC)1249475575 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-46016-7 035 $a(PPN)259466565 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011891471 100 $a20210417d2021 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe Two Faces of Judicial Power $eDynamics of Judicial-Political Bargaining /$fby Benjamin G. Engst 205 $a1st ed. 2021. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2021. 215 $a1 online resource (255 pages) 311 08$a9783030460150 311 08$a3030460150 327 $a1. The Two Faces of Judicial Power -- 2. The Judicial-Policy-Dialog Game -- 3. Judicial Power in Germany and the European Union -- 4. The First Face of Judicial Power -- 5. The Second Face of Judicial Power -- 6. Conclusion: The Implications of Judicial Power. 330 $aThis book shows that constitutional courts exercise direct and indirect power on political branches through decision-making. The first face of judicial power is characterized by courts directing political actors to implement judicial decisions in specific ways. The second face leads political actors to anticipate judicial review and draft policies accordingly. The judicial?political interaction originating from both faces is herein formally modeled. A cross-European comparison of pre-conditions of judicial power shows that the German Federal Constitutional Court is a well-suited representative case for a quantitative assessment of judicial power. Multinomial logistic regressions show that the court uses directives when evasion of decisions is costly while accounting for the government?s ability to implement decisions. Causal analyses of the second face of judicial power show that bills exposed to legal signals are drafted accounting for the court. These findings re-shape our understanding of judicialization and shed light on a silent form of judicialization. Benjamin G. Engst is a Postdoctoral Researcher in Political Science at the University of Mannheim, Germany. 606 $aPolitical science 606 $aEurope$xPolitics and government 606 $aAmerica$xPolitics and government 606 $aComparative government 606 $aGovernance and Government 606 $aEuropean Politics 606 $aAmerican Politics 606 $aComparative Politics 615 0$aPolitical science. 615 0$aEurope$xPolitics and government. 615 0$aAmerica$xPolitics and government. 615 0$aComparative government. 615 14$aGovernance and Government. 615 24$aEuropean Politics. 615 24$aAmerican Politics. 615 24$aComparative Politics. 676 $a340.115 676 $a340.11 700 $aEngst$b Benjamin G.$0849323 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910483152803321 996 $aThe Two Faces of Judicial Power$91896819 997 $aUNINA