LEADER 03514nam 22005055 450 001 9910483012303321 005 20200930195653.0 010 $a3-030-16496-9 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-16496-6 035 $a(CKB)4100000008280433 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5779969 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-030-16496-6 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000008280433 100 $a20190521d2019 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAnamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation$b[electronic resource] $eA Case Study of Shakespearean Films /$fby Robert Geal 205 $a1st ed. 2019. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer International Publishing :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2019. 215 $a1 online resource (250 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aPalgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture,$x2634-629X 311 $a3-030-16495-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a1. Introduction -- Part I: From Barthesian and Bakhtinian to Benvenistene Adaptation Studies: Theories of Film Adaptation -- 2. Dialogism and the Radical Text -- 3. Poststructuralism and the Radical Critic -- 4. The Dead Author and the Concealed Author -- Part II: The Drama of Authorship: A Taxonomy of Anamorphic Authorship -- 5. 'Fainomaic' Adaptation from the Verbal to the Visual -- 6. 'Įllagmic' Adaptation from Shakespearean to Non-(/Less-)Shakespearean Settings -- 7. The Drama of Foreknowledge -- 8. The Drama of the Diegetic Author -- 9. Conclusion. 330 $aThis book develops a new approach for the study of films adapted from canonical ?originals? such as Shakespeare?s plays. Departing from the current consensus that adaptation is a heightened example of how all texts inform and are informed by other texts, this book instead argues that film adaptations of canonical works extend cinema?s inherent mystification and concealment of its own artifice. Film adaptation consistently manipulates and obfuscates its traces of ?original? authorial enunciation, and oscillates between overtly authored articulation and seemingly un-authored unfolding. To analyse this process, the book moves from a dialogic to a psychoanalytic poststructuralist account of film adaptations of Shakespeare?s plays. The differences between these rival approaches to adaptation are explored in depth in the first part of the book, while the second part constructs a taxonomy of the various ways in which authorial signs are simultaneously foregrounded and concealed in adaptation?s anamorphic drama of authorship. . 410 0$aPalgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture,$x2634-629X 606 $aMotion pictures 606 $aLiterature, Modern 606 $aShakespeare, William, 1564-1616 606 $aAdaptation Studies$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/413180 606 $aShakespeare$3https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/817010 615 0$aMotion pictures. 615 0$aLiterature, Modern. 615 0$aShakespeare, William, 1564-1616. 615 14$aAdaptation Studies. 615 24$aShakespeare. 676 $a791.436 700 $aGeal$b Robert$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01225699 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910483012303321 996 $aAnamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation$92845798 997 $aUNINA