LEADER 00881nam 2200253la 450 001 9910482079303321 005 20221108083818.0 035 $a(UK-CbPIL)2090306490 035 $a(CKB)5500000000088379 035 $a(EXLCZ)995500000000088379 100 $a20210618d1631 uy | 101 0 $alat 135 $aurcn||||a|bb| 200 10$aIn satyram et sermones Hermophili Tanugriensis breviores notae et castigationes. By A.V$b[electronic resource] 210 $aLeiden $c[s.n.]$d1631 215 $aOnline resource (12°) 300 $aReproduction of original in Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Nationale bibliotheek van Nederland. 700 $aAnon$0815482 801 0$bUk-CbPIL 801 1$bUk-CbPIL 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910482079303321 996 $aIn satyram et sermones Hermophili Tanugriensis breviores notae et castigationes. By A.V$91951861 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03619nam 22007334a 450 001 9910974842403321 005 20251116215701.0 010 $a9786611722296 010 $a9781281722294 010 $a1281722294 010 $a9780300130034 010 $a0300130031 024 7 $a10.12987/9780300130034 035 $a(CKB)1000000000471921 035 $a(StDuBDS)AH23049636 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000144891 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11132532 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000144891 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10147942 035 $a(PQKB)10272590 035 $a(DE-B1597)484877 035 $a(OCoLC)952732236 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780300130034 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3420018 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10170044 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL172229 035 $a(OCoLC)923589753 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3420018 035 $a(Perlego)1449213 035 $z(OCoLC)952732236 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000471921 100 $a20020108d2002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aElectoral realignments $ea critique of an American genre /$fDavid R. Mayhew 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aNew Haven, CT $cYale University Press$d2002 215 $a1 online resource (192 p.) 225 1 $aThe Yale ISPS series 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 0 $a9780300093360 311 0 $a0300093365 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tIntroduction --$tChapter 2. The Realignments Perspective --$tChapter 3. Framing the Critique --$tChapter 4. The Cyclical Dynamic --$tChapter 5. Processes and Issues --$tChapter 6. Policies and Democracy --$tConclusion --$tIndex 330 $aThe study of electoral realignments is one of the most influential and intellectually stimulating enterprises undertaken by American political scientists. Realignment theory has been seen as a science able to predict changes, and generations of students, journalists, pundits, and political scientists have been trained to be on the lookout for "signs" of new electoral realignments. Now a major political scientist argues that the essential claims of realignment theory are wrong-that American elections, parties, and policymaking are not (and never were) reconfigured according to the realignment calendar. David Mayhew examines fifteen key empirical claims of realignment theory in detail and shows us why each in turn does not hold up under scrutiny. It is time, he insists, to open the field to new ideas. We might, for example, adopt a more nominalistic, skeptical way of thinking about American elections that highlights contingency, short-term election strategies, and valence issues. Or we might examine such broad topics as bellicosity in early American history, or racial questions in much of our electoral history. But we must move on from an old orthodoxy and failed model of illumination. 410 0$aYale ISPS series. 606 $aPolitical parties$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aElections$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aParty affiliation$zUnited States$xHistory 615 0$aPolitical parties$xHistory. 615 0$aElections$xHistory. 615 0$aParty affiliation$xHistory. 676 $a324/.0973 700 $aMayhew$b David R$0696724 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910974842403321 996 $aElectoral realignments$94353087 997 $aUNINA