LEADER 01865nam  2200541 a 450 
001 9910480272103321
005 20170816132238.0
010   $a0-7619-1517-6
010   $a1-322-42033-5
010   $a1-4522-6700-6
035   $a(CKB)2670000000339124
035   $a(EBL)1195910
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000675742
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12288205
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000675742
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10677517
035   $a(PQKB)11140865
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1195910
035   $a(OCoLC)1007858217
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000063701
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000339124
100   $a20120319d2002      fy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMeasurement instruments in clinical ethics$b[electronic resource] $eBarbara Klug Redman
210   $aThousand Oaks, Calif. ;$aLondon $cSAGE$dc2002
215   $a1 online resource (312 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4522-3264-4 
311   $a0-7619-1518-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
330 8 $aBased upon studies that use interview scales or other methods of gathering data that feature psychometric characteristics Barbara Redman's text assesses these methodologies and the wider debate concerning evolving ethical standards in medicine.
606   $aMedical ethics$xResearch$xMethodology
606   $aPsychometrics
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aMedical ethics$xResearch$xMethodology.
615  0$aPsychometrics.
676   $a616
700   $aRedman$b Barbara Klug$0851622
801  0$bStDuBDS
801  1$bStDuBDS
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910480272103321
996   $aMeasurement instruments in clinical ethics$92477681
997   $aUNINA