LEADER 02707nam 2200337 450 001 9910477142503321 005 20230329013952.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000000568517 035 $a(NjHacI)995470000000568517 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000000568517 100 $a20230329d2020 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aSouthern Perspective on Development Studies /$fCarlos Mallorquin 210 1$aSantiago :$cAriadna Ediciones,$d2020. 215 $a1 online resource 327 $aIntroduction 5 -- Chapter 1 A Southern Perspective on Development Studies: Contributions from Latin America 21 -- Chapter 2 The Unfamiliar Rau?l Prebisch (1943-1949) 53 -- Chapter 3 Celso Furtado and Development: A Brief Outline (1950-2004) 99 -- Chapter 4 Theoretical Misrecognitions as the Source of Development Theory De?ja? Vu 123 -- Chapter 5 How Economics Forgot Power 149 -- Chapter 6 All That Is Solid Does Not Necessarily Melt Into Air 181 -- References 235. 330 $aThis book suggests the importance of examining alternative discourses in the social sciences, in this case economics, beyond western-centric cultural milieu. The account attempts to unveil the existence of a post Second World War economic approach developed in Latin America. The perspective questioned the dominant economic science disseminated within and outside the Anglo-Saxon or Eurocentric countries (western-centric academia) during the 1950´s. Today, after the appalling cataclysms in welfare and equality generated by neoclassical economics, an alternative economics seems order in the Northern and Southern hemisphere. The rebirth of Latin American Structuralism within the developing countries, and the widely publicized names of Ra??l Prebisch, Celso Furtado among others, within the western-centric audiences requires an up to date of the vocabulary and concepts. Retrospectively these authors discussed can be examined as the original sources in Latin America among those who developed the basis of decolonial thought. The book problematizes the domestication of Latin American Structuralism in the Northern or Southern hemisphere alike and discusses its potential similarities to Post-Keynesian perspectives related to power asymmetries among countries, firms, and heterogenous agents. 606 $aPolitical science 615 0$aPolitical science. 676 $a320.01 700 $aMallorquin$b Carlos$0863845 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910477142503321 996 $aSouthern Perspective on Development Studies$93085571 997 $aUNINA