LEADER 03018nam 2200397 450 001 9910477070103321 005 20230327082518.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000000569241 035 $a(NjHacI)995470000000569241 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000000569241 100 $a20230327d2020 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aArs Edendi Lecture Series /$fErika Kihlman and Denis Searby 210 1$aStockholm, Sweden :$cStockholm University Press,$d2020. 215 $a1 online resource (146 pages) 330 $aThis is the fifth and final volume of lectures on textual criticism and classical philology - broadly understood - given within the framework of the Ars edendi research programme (2008-2015). ;Two of the six papers in this volume stem from a 2015 workshop on editorial theory and method, the theme of which dealt with fragments and the writing of commentaries. As regards the former, S. Douglas Olson problematizes the creation and continuation of scholarly knowledge concerning texts that have only come down to us in a fragmentary state, emphazising the challenges and pitfalls that lay in wait for the editor. Benjamin Millis offers a nuanced homage and apology for the traditional text edition with a scholarly commentary, especially underscoring its importance as a connective pathway between text and reader as well as the impetus it can give to scholarly research. ;The other four lectures were given at the concluding conference of the Ars edendi programme, held in August 2016. In a case study Cynthia Damon shares her reflections on how to digitally edit Pliny's Natural History in a form that will provide this work's rich reception history and at the same time its extensive use of sources, many of which are now lost. The digital component is also prominent in Odd Einar Haugen's contribution in which he shows that digital mark-up is also an editorial enterprise and how it can be useful for the textual scholar. Dorothea Weber gives an insider's view of the Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, an editorial project on-going since 1864, and especially how improved cataloguing has led to numerous discoveries of texts by St. Augustine. As a conclusion to the volume, David Greetham, one of the founders of the Society for Textual Scholarship, reflects on three different methods for editing texts that have undergone various degrees of rescription, namely the oeuvres of Eriugena, Coleridge, and Eliot. 517 $aArs Edendi Lecture Series 606 $aEditing 606 $aPaleography 606 $aGreek literature 615 0$aEditing. 615 0$aPaleography. 615 0$aGreek literature. 676 $a091 700 $aKihlman$b Erika$01349045 702 $aSearby$b Denis 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910477070103321 996 $aArs Edendi Lecture Series$93086991 997 $aUNINA