LEADER 02986nam 2200421 450 001 9910476832103321 005 20230518023754.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000000566272 035 $a(NjHacI)995470000000566272 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000000566272 100 $a20230518d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aEthics, conflict and medical treatment for children $efrom disagreement to dissensus /$fDominic Wilkinson, Julian Savulescu ; foreword by Peter Singer, Neena Modi 210 1$aLondon :$cElsevier,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (180 pages) 311 $a0-7020-7782-8 327 $aI: Disagreement -- The charlie gard case -- II: Agreement -- Futility -- Best interests -- Resources -- Research -- Parents -- III: Agreeing to disagree -- Dissensus and value pluralism -- Embracing disagreement -- Learning from charlie gard. 330 $aWhat should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new "dissensus" framework for future cases of disagreement. 517 $aEthics, conflict and medical treatment for children 606 $aPediatrics$xMoral and ethical aspects 606 $aPediatrics$xMoral and ethical aspects$vCase studies 615 0$aPediatrics$xMoral and ethical aspects. 615 0$aPediatrics$xMoral and ethical aspects 676 $a618.92 700 $aWilkinson$b Dominic$01348236 702 $aSavulescu$b Julian 702 $aSinger$b Peter 702 $aModi$b Neena 801 0$bNjHacI 801 1$bNjHacl 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910476832103321 996 $aEthics, conflict and medical treatment for children$93085587 997 $aUNINA