LEADER 01755nam  2200349 n 450 
001 9910476825603321
005 20230510181141.0
035   $a(CKB)5470000000566300
035   $a(NjHacI)995470000000566300
035   $a(EXLCZ)995470000000566300
100   $a20230510d2020      uu             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aDangerous Science /$fDaniel J. Rozell
210  1$a[Place of publication not identified] :$cUbiquity Press,$d2020.
215   $a1 online resource (162 pages)
311   $a1-911529-91-9 
330   $aThe public is generally enthusiastic about the latest science and technology, but sometimes research threatens the physical safety or ethical norms of society. When this happens, scientists and engineers can find themselves unprepared in the midst of an intense science policy debate. In the absence of convincing evidence, technological optimists and skeptics struggle to build consensus. In these situations, it is best to sidestep the instigating controversy by using a broad risk-benefit assessment as a risk exploration tool to help scientists and engineers accomplish their goals while avoiding physical or moral dangers. Dangerous Science explores the intersection of science policy and risk analysis to determine ways to minimize negative impacts of science and technology on society.
517   $aDangerous Science 
606   $aGeneral education
615  0$aGeneral education.
676   $a370.11
700   $aRozell$b Daniel J.$0957464
801  0$bNjHacI
801  1$bNjHacl
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910476825603321
996   $aDangerous Science$92168678
997   $aUNINA