LEADER 03443nam 2200565 450 001 9910467062703321 005 20200923020339.0 010 $a1-5015-0423-1 010 $a1-5015-0432-0 024 7 $a10.1515/9781501504327 035 $a(CKB)4340000000210759 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5116120 035 $a(DE-B1597)463215 035 $a(OCoLC)1011440164 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781501504327 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5116120 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11462241 035 $a(OCoLC)1009206755 035 $a(EXLCZ)994340000000210759 100 $a20171129h20172017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aMeaning, context and methodology /$fedited by Sarah-Jane Conrad, Klaus Petrus 210 1$aBerlin, [Germany] ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cDe Gruyter Mouton,$d2017. 210 4$dİ2017 215 $a1 online resource (232 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aMouton Series in Pragmatics,$x1864-6409 ;$vVolume 19 311 $a1-5015-1217-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tIntroduction -- $tOpen texture and schematicity as arguments for non-referential semantics -- $tFull but not saturated: The myth of mandatory primary pragmatic processes -- $tHow to get lost in context: Searle on context, content and literal meaning -- $tMeaning and interpretation -- $tThe role of context in semantics: A Relevance Theory perspective -- $tBoo semantics: Radical nonfactualism and non truth-conditional meaning -- $tMetaphor and mercurial content -- $tContext, two-dimensional semantics and conceptual analysis -- $tThe use of the Binding Argument in the debate about location -- $tSlices of meaning: Levels of analysis and the unity of understanding -- $tContributors -- $tIndex 330 $aWhat methodological impact does Contextualism have on the philosophy of language? This collection sets out to provide some answers. The authors in this volume question three ultimately connected assumptions of the philosophy of language. The first assumption relates to the predominant status of referential semantics and its power to explain truth-conditional meaning. This assumption has come under attack by the context thesis and a number of papers pursue the question of whether this is justified. The second assumption gives priority to assertive sentences when considering language use. The context thesis changes our understanding of language use altogether; possible implications from this methodological shift are addressed in this volume. According to the third assumption, philosophical analysis amounts to nothing more than conceptual analysis. The context thesis risks undermining this project. Whether conceptual analysis can still be defended as a methodological tool is discussed in this volume. 410 0$aMouton series in pragmatics ;$vVolume 19. 606 $aContext (Linguistics) 606 $aSemantics 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aContext (Linguistics) 615 0$aSemantics. 676 $a401/.43 702 $aConrad$b Sarah 702 $aPetrus$b Klaus$f1967- 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910467062703321 996 $aMeaning, context and methodology$92474261 997 $aUNINA