LEADER 05453nam 2200697 a 450 001 9910465623703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-19-151442-X 010 $a1-280-84677-1 010 $a1-4294-6934-X 010 $a0-19-925268-8 035 $a(CKB)2560000000295417 035 $a(EBL)422600 035 $a(OCoLC)437108940 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000144621 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11155215 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000144621 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10147927 035 $a(PQKB)11511458 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000072620 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC422600 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL422600 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10263703 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL84677 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000295417 100 $a20050323d2004 fy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEfficiency and complexity in grammars$b[electronic resource] /$fJohn A. Hawkins 210 $aOxford ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2004 215 $a1 online resource (322 p.) 225 1 $aOxford linguistics 300 $aSeries statement from jacket. 311 $a0-19-925269-6 311 $a0-19-171930-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [277]-293) and indexes. 327 $aContents; Preface; Abbreviations; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Performance-grammar correspondences: a hypothesis; 1.2 Predictions of the PGCH; 1.3 Efficiency and complexity; 1.4 Issues of explanation; 1.5 The challenge of multiple preferences; 2 Linguistic Forms, Properties, and Efficient Signaling; 2.1 Forms and properties; 2.2 Property assignments in combinatorial and dependency relations; 2.3 Efficiency and complexity in form-property signaling; 3 Defining the Efficiency Principles and their Predictions; 3.1 Minimize Domains (MiD); 3.2 Minimize Forms (MiF); 3.2.1 The logic of MiF 327 $a3.2.2 Form minimization predictions3.2.3 Maximize the ease of processing enrichments; 3.3 Maximize On-line Processing (MaOP); 3.3.1 Unassignments and misassignments; 3.3.2 The quantitative metric; 3.3.3 Predictions for performance and grammars; 4 More on Form Minimization; 4.1 Greenberg's markedness hierarchies; 4.2 Markedness hierarchies in diachrony; 4.2.1 Morphological inventory predictions; 4.2.2 Declining distinctions predictions; 4.3 Grammaticalization and processing; 4.4 The grammaticalization of definiteness marking; 4.4.1 Semantic/pragmatic extensions; 4.4.2 Syntactic extensions 327 $a4.5 Processing enrichments through structural parallelism4.6 The principle of conventionalized dependency; 5 Adjacency Effects Within Phrases; 5.1 EIC preferences for adjacency in performance; 5.1.1 EIC in head-initial structures; 5.1.2 EIC in head-final structures; 5.2 Multiple preferences for adjacency in performance; 5.2.1 Multiple preferences in English; 5.2.2 Multiple preferences in Japanese; 5.2.3 Total domain differentials; 5.3 EIC preferences for adjacency in grammars; 5.3.1 The Greenbergian correlations; 5.3.2 Other ordering universals 327 $a5.4 Multiple preferences for adjacency in grammars5.5 Competitions between domains and phrases; 5.5.1 Relative clause extrapositions in German; 6 Minimal Forms in Complements/Adjuncts and Proximity; 6.1 Minimal formal marking in performance; 6.1.1 Wh, that/zero relativizers; 6.1.2 Other alternations; 6.2 Minimal formal marking in grammars; 6.3 Morphological typology and Sapir's 'drift'; 7 Relative Clause and Wh-movement Universals; 7.1 The grammar and processing of filler-gap dependencies; 7.2 The Keenan-Comrie Accessibility Hierarchy; 7.2.1 Performance support for the FGD complexity ranking 327 $a7.2.2 Grammatical support for the FGD complexity ranking7.3 Wh-fronting and basic word order; 7.4 Other complexity hierarchies; 7.4.1 A clause-embedding hierarchy; 7.4.2 Reduce additional syntactic processing; 7.4.3 Reduce additional semantic processing; 7.5 MaOP effects; 7.5.1 Fillers First; 7.5.2 Relative clause ordering asymmetries; 7.5.3 Grammatical conventions that facilitate filler-gap processing; 7.6 That-trace in English and processing enrichments in Japanese; 8 Symmetries, Asymmetric Dependencies, and Earliness Effects; 8.1 Some cross-linguistic generalizations; 8.1.1 Symmetries 327 $a8.1.2 Asymmetries 330 $aJack Hawkins has long been a trail-blazer in the attempt to reconcile the results of formal and functional linguistics. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars charts new territory in this domain. The book argues persuasively that a small number of performance-based principles combine to account for many grammatical constraints proposed by formal linguists and also explain the origins of numerous typological generalizations discovered by functionalists. - Frederick J. Newmeyer, University of Washington;Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars is a landmark work, setting a new standard in the study 410 0$aOxford linguistics. 606 $aLanguage and languages$xGrammars 606 $aLinguistics 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aLanguage and languages$xGrammars. 615 0$aLinguistics. 676 $a415 700 $aHawkins$b John A$0152002 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910465623703321 996 $aEfficiency and complexity in grammars$91030314 997 $aUNINA