LEADER 05531nam 2200685 a 450 001 9910465452003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a90-272-7155-0 035 $a(CKB)2560000000105274 035 $a(EBL)1211769 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000888033 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11472035 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000888033 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10847113 035 $a(PQKB)10567081 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1211769 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1211769 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10718655 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL497462 035 $a(OCoLC)851078430 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000105274 100 $a20130524d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aProximization$b[electronic resource] $ethe pragmatics of symbolic distance crossing /$fPiotr Cap 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (230 p.) 225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond new series,$x0922-842X ;$vv. 232 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-5637-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aProximization; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Project overview; 1.2 A brief history of proximization; 1.3 Direct goals; 1.4 Theoretical environment and theoretical implications as indirect goals; 1.5 Chapter overview; 2. Proximization as a (linguistic) concept; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Paul Chilton: From "representational proximising" in "geopolitical spaces" to Deictic Space Theo; 2.2.1 The 2004 approach: 3-d positioning and representations of the Kosovo war; 2.2.2 Discourse Space Theory or Deictic Space Theory? 327 $a2.3 Piotr Cap: Proximization for legitimization in search of quantifiable evidence; 2.3.1 The conceptual and "qualitative" stage; 2.3.2 The "qualitative-quantitative" stage; 2.4 Christopher Hart: Proximization and/within coercion, predication, metaphor; 2.5 Patricia Dunmire: Proximization across political genres; 2.6 Other approaches; 2.7 Approaches to proximization versus traditional accounts of deixis and perspective; 2.8 Summary; 3. Proximization and legitimization; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Legitimization: A multi-level phenomenon 327 $a3.2.1 Perspectives from cognitive science, socio-political theory and social psychology3.2.2 Perspectives from linguistic pragmatics, text linguistics and critical discourse studies; 3.3 Legitimization through proximization, proximization for legitimization; 3.3.1 A sample analysis; 3.3.2 Maintaining the (AEI) legitimization: Changes in proximization strategies; 3.3.3 Interventionist discourses; 3.4 Beyond the war-on-terror; 4. Conceptual structure of the (S)patial-(T)emporal-(A)xiological model of proximization; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Spatial proximization 327 $a4.2.1 Threat construal through the ODC characterization4.2.2 Threat construal through the ODC impact speed; 4.2.3 Threat construal through the ODC impact consequences; 4.3 Temporal proximization; 4.3.1 "A September morning"; 4.3.2 Towards more quantifiable markers; 4.4 Axiological proximization; 4.4.1 Axiological proximization with high and explicit impact probability; 4.4.2 Axiological proximization with low(er) and implicit impact probability; 4.5 Conclusions; 5. The STA model and the 2001-2010 decade of the anti-terrorist discourse: Methodology and data; 5.1 Introduction 327 $a5.2 Three frameworks of proximization5.2.1 The spatial proximization framework; 5.2.1.1 Category assignment of spatial proximization items; 5.2.2 The temporal proximization framework; 5.2.2.1 Category assignment of temporal proximization items; 5.2.3 The axiological proximization framework; 5.2.3.1 Category assignment of axiological proximization items; 5.3 The corpus and the sub-corpora; 5.4 Counts from the proximization frameworks; 5.4.1 Counts from the spatial framework; 5.4.2 Counts from the temporal framework; 5.4.3 Counts from the axiological framework; 5.5 Conclusion 327 $a6. The STA model and the 2001-2010 decade of the anti-terrorist discourse: Discussion 330 $aThis book proposes a new theory ("proximization theory") in the area of political/public legitimization discourse. Located at the intersection of Pragmatics, Cognitive Linguistics and critical approaches, the theory holds that legitimization of broadly consequential political/public policies, such as pre-emptive interventionist campaigns, is best accomplished by forced construals of virtual external threats encroaching upon the speaker and her audience's home territory. The construals, which proceed along spatial, temporal and axiological lines, are forced by strategic deployment of lexico-gra 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond companion series ;$v232. 606 $aPragmatics 606 $aDiscourse analysis$xPolitical aspects 606 $aRhetoric$xPolitical aspects 606 $aEnglish language$xRhetoric 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPragmatics. 615 0$aDiscourse analysis$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aRhetoric$xPolitical aspects. 615 0$aEnglish language$xRhetoric. 676 $a320.01/4 700 $aCap$b Piotr$0751111 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910465452003321 996 $aProximization$91510561 997 $aUNINA