LEADER 04301nam  2200733Ia 450 
001 9910465364403321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-19-804012-1
010   $a9786610428526
010   $a1-280-42852-X
010   $a1-60256-557-0
035   $a(CKB)2560000000295352
035   $a(EBL)3051960
035   $a(OCoLC)567935874
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000086115
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11111376
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000086115
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10029586
035   $a(PQKB)10641377
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000073352
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3051960
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC271264
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3051960
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10091882
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL42852
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL271264
035   $a(OCoLC)437923758
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000295352
100   $a20041028d2005      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aCreating language crimes$b[electronic resource] $ehow law enforcement uses (and misuses) language /$fRoger W. Shuy
210   $aOxford ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2005
215   $a1 online resource (209 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-19-518166-2 
311   $a0-19-978847-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aContents; Introduction; Part I: Language Crimes, Conversational Strategies, and Language Power; 1. How Language Crimes Are Created; 2. Conversational Strategies Used to Create Crimes; 3. The Power of Conversational Strategies; Part II: Uses by Cooperating Witnesses; 4. Overlapping, Ambiguity, and the Hit and Run in a Solicitation to Murder Case: Texas v. T. Cullen Davis; 5. Retelling, Scripting, and Lying in a Murder Case: Florida v. Alan Mackerley
327   $a6. Interrupting, Overlapping, Lying, Not Taking "No" for an Answer, and Representing Illegality Differently to Separate Targets in a Stolen Property Case: US v. Prakesh Patel and Daniel Houston7. Eleven Little Ambiguities and How They Grew in a Business Fraud Case: US v. Paul Webster and Joe Martino; 8. Discourse Ambiguity in a Contract Fraud Case: US v. David Smith; 9. Contamination and Manipulation in a Bribery Case: US v. Paul Manziel; 10. Scripting by Requesting Directives and Apologies in a Sexual Misconduct Case: Idaho v. J. Mussina; Part III: Uses by Law Enforcement Officers
327   $a11. Police Camouflaging in an Obstruction of Justice Case: US v. Brian Lett12. Police Camouflaging in a Purchasing Stolen Property Case: US v. Tariq Shalash; 13. A Rogue Cop and Every Strategy He Can Think Of: The Wenatchee Washington Sex Ring Case; 14. An Undercover Policeman Uses Ambiguity, Hit and Run, Interrupting, Scripting, and Refusing to Take "No" for an Answer in a Solicitation to Murder Case: The Crown v. Mohammed Arshad; 15. Manipulating the Tape, Interrupting, Inaccurate Restatements, and Scripting in a Murder Case: Florida v. Jerry Townsend
327   $aPart IV: Conversational Strategies as Evidence16. Eight Questions about the Power of Conversational Strategies in Undercover Police Investigations; References Cited; Cases Cited; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; Q; R; S; T; U; V; W
330 8 $aRoger Shuy illustrates how linguistic analysis of undercover tape recordings made by law enforcement can help defense attorneys, law enforcement officers, judges, and juries better understand the effects of conversational strategies used to give the appearance of criminal activity.
606   $aUndercover operations$zUnited States
606   $aPolice$zUnited States$xLanguage
606   $aCommunication in law enforcement$zUnited States
606   $aForensic linguistics$zUnited States
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aUndercover operations
615  0$aPolice$xLanguage.
615  0$aCommunication in law enforcement
615  0$aForensic linguistics
676   $a363.2/01/4
700   $aShuy$b Roger W$0195562
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910465364403321
996   $aCreating language crimes$92445089
997   $aUNINA