LEADER 04354nam 2200733 450 001 9910464491003321 005 20210428192039.0 010 $a0-8014-7090-0 010 $a1-336-20809-0 010 $a0-8014-7091-9 024 7 $a10.7591/9780801470912 035 $a(CKB)3710000000111080 035 $a(OCoLC)880499177 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10870826 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001195171 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12395864 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001195171 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11155247 035 $a(PQKB)10838832 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001510143 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3138602 035 $a(OCoLC)966898664 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse51833 035 $a(DE-B1597)478491 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780801470912 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3138602 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10870826 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL752095 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000111080 100 $a20140520h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aCollaborative governance for urban revitalization $elessons from empowerment zones /$fMichael J. Rich and Robert P. Stoker 210 1$aIthaca, New York :$cCornell University Press,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (297 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 0 $a0-8014-7912-6 311 0 $a0-8014-5250-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tPreface --$tIntroduction --$t1. Federal Aid and the Cities --$t2. Good Governance --$t3. Revitalization Strategies and Programs --$t4. Local Governance Structures and Processes --$t5. What Happened in EZ Neighborhoods? --$t6. Atlanta's Empowerment Zone --$t7. Baltimore's Empowerment Zone --$t8. Explaining Revitalization Outcomes --$tConclusion --$tNotes --$tReferences --$tIndex 330 $aFor more than one hundred years, governments have grappled with the complex problem of how to revitalize distressed urban areas. In 1995, the original urban Empowerment Zones (Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, New York, and Philadelphia) each received a$100 million federal block grant and access to a variety of market-oriented policy tools to support the implementation of a ten-year strategic plan to increase economic opportunities and promote sustainable community development in high-poverty neighborhoods. In Collaborative Governance for Urban Revitalization, Michael J. Rich and Robert P. Stoker confront the puzzle of why the outcomes achieved by the original Empowerment Zones varied so widely given that each city had the same set of federal policy tools and resources and comparable neighborhood characteristics. The authors' analysis, based on more than ten years of field research in Atlanta and Baltimore and extensive empirical analysis of EZ processes and outcomes in all six cities shows that revitalization outcomes are best explained by the quality of local governance. Good local governance makes positive contributions to revitalization efforts, while poor local governance retards progress. While policy design and contextual factors are important, how cities craft and carry out their strategies are critical determinants of successful revitalization. Rich and Stoker find that good governance is often founded on public-private cooperation, a stance that argues against both the strongest critics of neoliberalism (who see private enterprise as dangerous in principle) and the strongest opponents of liberalism (who would like to reduce the role of government). 606 $aEnterprise zones$zUnited States 606 $aUrban renewal$xGovernment policy$zUnited States 606 $aUrban renewal$zGeorgia$zAtlanta 606 $aUrban renewal$zMaryland$zBaltimore 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEnterprise zones 615 0$aUrban renewal$xGovernment policy 615 0$aUrban renewal 615 0$aUrban renewal 676 $a307.3/4160973 700 $aRich$b Michael J.$01049534 702 $aStoker$b Robert P. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910464491003321 996 $aCollaborative governance for urban revitalization$92478611 997 $aUNINA