LEADER 03951nam  2200625Ia 450 
001 9910464082603321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-283-03954-0
010   $a9786613039545
010   $a90-04-18851-7
010   $a90-04-18774-X
024 7 $a10.1163/ej.9789004187740.i-358
035   $a(CKB)3190000000000605
035   $a(EBL)682322
035   $a(OCoLC)707926487
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000469460
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11302110
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000469460
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10511058
035   $a(PQKB)11371706
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC682322
035   $a(OCoLC)690907564
035   $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004188518
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL682322
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10455184
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL303954
035   $a(PPN)174392028
035   $a(EXLCZ)993190000000000605
100   $a20100706d2010      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aGaius meets Cicero$b[electronic resource] $elaw and rhetoric in the school controversies /$fby Tessa G. Leesen
210   $aLeiden, The Netherlands ;$aBoston $cMartinus Nijhoff Publishers$d2010
215   $a1 online resource (372 p.)
225 1 $aLegal history library ;$vv. 2
300   $aOriginally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--Universiteit van Tilburg, 2009.
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tPreliminary Material /$rT.G. Leesen --$tIntroduction /$rT.G. Leesen --$tI. Male Puberty /$rT.G. Leesen --$tII. Res Mancipi /$rT.G. Leesen --$tIII. Specificatio /$rT.G. Leesen --$tIV. Filius Praeteritus /$rT.G. Leesen --$tV. Legatum Per Vindicationem (1) /$rT.G. Leesen --$tVI. Legatum Per Vindicationem (2) /$rT.G. Leesen --$tVII. Legatum Per Praeceptionem /$rT.G. Leesen --$tVIII. Datio Tutoris /$rT.G. Leesen --$tIX. Regula Catoniana /$rT.G. Leesen --$tX. In Iure Cessio Hereditatis /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXI. Condicio Impossibilis /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXII. Stipulatio For A Third Person /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXIII. Literal Contract /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXIV. Emptio Venditio (1) /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXV. Emptio Venditio (2) /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXVI. Mandatum /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXVII. Servus Communis /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXVIII. Datio In Solutum /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXIX. Novatio /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXX. Actio Noxalis /$rT.G. Leesen --$tXXI. Noxae Deditio /$rT.G. Leesen --$tConclusion /$rT.G. Leesen --$tAppendix 1. Pomp., D. 1.2.2.47?53: Text And Translation /$rT.G. Leesen --$tAppendix 2. The Leaders Of The Schools /$rT.G. Leesen --$tAppendix 3. The Sabinians And The Proculians: Topoi /$rT.G. Leesen --$tBibliography /$rT.G. Leesen --$tSource Index /$rT.G. Leesen.
330   $aGaius Meets Cicero. Law and Rhetoric in the School Controversies sheds new light on a much debated issue in the field of Roman law, id est the so-called 'school controversies' between the Sabinians and the Proculians. Tessa Leesen rejects the general assumption in modern literature that the two schools each adhered to a fundamentally different theoretical conception of law. She argues that the 'school controversies' as described in Gaius' Institutiones arose in legal practice when the heads of the two schools were consulted by two conflicting parties and each gave opposing advice. In order to make their opinions persuasive, the jurists were in need of adequate arguments. For this purpose, they made use of rhetoric and of the argumentative theory of topoi as described in Cicero's Topica .
410  0$aLegal history library ;$vv. 2.
606   $aRoman law$xHistory
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aRoman law$xHistory.
676   $a340.5/4
700   $aLeesen$b Tessa G$0510880
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910464082603321
996   $aGaius meets Cicero$9767782
997   $aUNINA