LEADER 02424nam  2200589 a 450 
001 9910464078503321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-283-14205-8
010   $a1-4438-2749-5
010   $a9786613142054
035   $a(CKB)3360000000431419
035   $a(EBL)1080893
035   $a(OCoLC)820123301
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000543502
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12210927
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000543502
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10533600
035   $a(PQKB)11788592
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1080893
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1080893
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10632873
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL314205
035   $a(EXLCZ)993360000000431419
100   $a20110427d2011      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aDoes it really mean that?$b[electronic resource] $einterpreting the literary ambiguous /$fedited by Kathleen Dubs and Janka Kas?c?a?kova?
210   $aNew Castle upon Tyne $cCambridge Scholars$d2011
215   $a1 online resource (253 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4438-2661-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $apt. 1. Medieval literature -- pt. 2. British literature -- pt. 3. American literature -- pt. 4. Theoretical applications.
330   $aHowever disconnected the essays in the volume might appear to be at first glance, the unifying factor is the very notion of ambiguity-which is one of the essential features of the postmodern age: how it can be defined as opposed to what it means or is, where it can be found, to what purposes it can be put, including questions of whether it is a positive or negative factor. But this, of course, is not a new phenomenon. Writers have always depended on equivocation, multiplicity of meaning, unc...
606   $aAmbiguity in literature
606   $aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aAmbiguity in literature.
615  0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism.
676   $a809.93384
701   $aDubs$b Kathleen E$0918823
701   $aKas?c?a?kova?$b Janka$0918824
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910464078503321
996   $aDoes it really mean that$92060763
997   $aUNINA