LEADER 05381oam 2200685I 450 001 9910464034903321 005 20170816162036.0 010 $a1-315-03643-6 010 $a1-135-21182-5 024 7 $a10.4324/9781315036434 035 $a(CKB)2670000000529548 035 $a(EBL)1645456 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001131870 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12491749 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001131870 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11145472 035 $a(PQKB)10046701 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1645456 035 $a(OCoLC)878138926 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000529548 100 $a20180331e20131997 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aClass, state and agricultural productivity in Egypt $ea study of the inverse relationship between farm size and land productivity /$fGraham Dyer ; foreword by Terence J. Byres 210 1$aAbingdon, Oxon :$cRoutledge,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (229 p.) 225 1 $aLibrary of Peasant Studies ;$vNumber 15 300 $aFirst published in 1997 by Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. 311 $a0-7146-4245-2 311 $a0-7146-4707-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aCover; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Table of Contents; List of Tables; Acknowledgements; Foreword; INTRODUCTION The Present study: Nature and Rationale; I The Nature of the Inverse Relationship and its Apparent Policy Implications; Introduction; I.1 Some apparent policy implications; I.2 Conceptual, statistical and methodological problems; I.3 The inverse relationship vindicated and some conjoint relationships; Summary and conclusions; Notes to Chapter I; II Theoretical Approaches to the Inverse Relationship: Qualitative and Quantitative Factor Differences; Introduction 327 $aII.1 Management and labour quality hypothesesII.2 Land fertility hypothesis; II.3 Labour intensity and labour market dualism: the Sen model; II.4 A critique of the marginalist approach; Summary and conclusions; Notes to Chapter II; III A Class-Based Approach and the Breakdown of the Inverse Relationship in the Dynamic Context; Introduction; III.1 Beyond the marginalist approach; III.2 The inverse relationship in the context of backward agriculture; III.3 The static nature of the Sen approach and the breakdown of the inverse relationship in the dynamic context; Summary and conclusions 327 $aNotes to Chapter IIIIV The Evidence for an Inverse Relationship between Farm Size and Productivity in Egypt: A Shadow Debate; Introduction; IV.1 Some evidence for an inverse relationship in Egypt: Shepley, Radwan, Wilson and Mabro; IV.2 Aggregation and land heterogeneity: Crouch et al.; IV.3 The inverse relationship denied in Egypt: Platt and Commander; Summary and conclusions; Notes to Chapter IV; V The Political Economy of the Contemporary Egyptian Countryside; Introduction; V.1 Agrarian reform and the consolidation of the rich peasantry; V.2 The agrarian elite and the co-operative system 327 $aV.3 Rich peasants and co-operative creditV.4 Implications with respect to the diffusion of modern technology of rich peasant bias in credit; V.5 The dominance of the rich peasantry and the political sphere; Summary and conclusions; Notes to Chapter V; VI A Disaggregated Analysis of the ILO Data: Technical Change and the Inverse Relationship in Egypt; Introduction; VI.1 The ILO survey and its characteristics; VI.2 Analysis and results: (i) The Radwan regression and its questionable nature - the need for a more disaggregated approach 327 $aVI.3 Analysis and results: (ii) A digression on technological change in Egyptian agriculture, uneven development and regional heterogeneityVI.4 Analysis and results: (iii) A disaggregated analysis and evidence of transition; Summary and conclusions; Notes to Chapter VI; VII A Closer Look at the Inverse Relationship in the Context of Agrarian Transition: Evidence from Fieldwork in Rural Egypt; Introduction; VII.1 Fieldwork methodology and problems; VII.2 An inverse relationship village in Giza; VII.3 The roots of the inverse relationship in Shubak; Summary and conclusions; Notes to Chapter VII 327 $aVIII A Positive Relationship Village in Qena and the Emerging Comparative Picture in the Context of Egyptian Agrarian Transition 330 $aThe inverse relationship between farm size and productivity is accepted as a ""stylized fact"" of agriculture in developing countries. This study uses Egyptian fieldwork data to examine factors creating this relationship, and the impact of economic and technological change on the relationship. 410 0$aLibrary of peasant studies ;$vNumber 15. 606 $aFarms, Size of$zEgypt 606 $aAgricultural productivity$zEgypt 606 $aPeasants$zEgypt 606 $aAgriculture and state$zEgypt 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aFarms, Size of 615 0$aAgricultural productivity 615 0$aPeasants 615 0$aAgriculture and state 676 $a338.1/6 700 $aDyer$b Graham$f1958,$0966517 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910464034903321 996 $aClass, state and agricultural productivity in Egypt$92193524 997 $aUNINA