LEADER 03415nam  2200613Ia 450 
001 9910464000403321
005 20170815101942.0
010   $a1-4623-8301-7
010   $a1-4527-7327-0
010   $a9786612843334
010   $a1-4518-7265-8
010   $a1-282-84333-8
035   $a(CKB)3170000000055276
035   $a(EBL)1608309
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000940119
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11512683
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000940119
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10948462
035   $a(PQKB)10843469
035   $a(OCoLC)645227321
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1608309
035   $a(EXLCZ)993170000000055276
100   $a20090914d2009      uf             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aDevelopment aid and economic growth$b[electronic resource] $ea positive long-run relation /$fprepared by Camelia Minoiu and Sanjay G. Reddy
210   $a[Washington, D.C.] $cInternational Monetary Fund, IMF Institute$d2009
215   $a1 online resource (35 p.)
225 1 $aIMF working paper ;$vWP/09/118
300   $a"May 2009."
311   $a1-4519-1695-7 
327   $aContents; I. Introduction; II. Literature Review; III. The Pitfalls of Misspecification; IV. Defining Developmental Aid; V. Empirical Evidence; A. Cross-Sectional Regressions; B. Panel Regressions; VI. Further Results; A. Income Threshold Effects; B. Aid and the Policy Environment; C. Caveats; VII. Conclusions; References; Appendix; Appendix Tables; 1. Variables and data sources; 2. Summary statisics of selected variables; Appendix Figures; 1. Bilateral and multilateral aid as shares of total aid; 2. Developmental aid as a share of bilateral aid
327   $a3. Cross-sectional OLS regressions: Replicating previous results4. Cross-sectional OLS regressions: The effect of lagged total aid on growth; 5. Cross-sectional OLS regressions: The effect of developmental aid on growth; 3. Growth vs. lagged total bilateral aid; 4. Growth vs. lagged bilateral aid from G1 donors; 5. Growth vs. lagged bilateral aid from G2 donors; 6. Growth vs. lagged bilateral aid from G3 donors; 6. Panel (System GMM) regressions: The effect of developmental aid on growth
330   $aWe analyze the growth impact of official development assistance to developing countries. Our approach is different from that of previous studies in two major ways. First, we disentangle the effects of two kinds of aid: developmental and non-developmental. Second, our specifications allow for the effect of aid on economic growth to occur over long periods. Our results indicate that developmental aid promotes long-run growth. The effect is significant, large and robust to different specifications and estimation techniques.
410  0$aIMF working paper ;$vWP/09/118.
606   $aEconomic assistance$zDeveloping countries
606   $aEconomic development$zDeveloping countries
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aEconomic assistance
615  0$aEconomic development
700   $aMinoiu$b Camelia$f1977-$0999087
701   $aReddy$b Sanjay$0999088
712 02$aInternational Monetary Fund.
712 02$aIMF Institute.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910464000403321
996   $aDevelopment aid and economic growth$92292176
997   $aUNINA