LEADER 04392nam  2200661Ia 450 
001 9910463997503321
005 20200426063043.0
010   $a1-4623-7090-X
010   $a1-282-84406-7
010   $a1-4527-7730-6
010   $a1-4518-7345-X
010   $a9786612844065
035   $a(CKB)3170000000055347
035   $a(EBL)1608825
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000939928
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11553611
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000939928
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10956163
035   $a(PQKB)11096988
035   $a(OCoLC)649749839
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1608825
035   $a(EXLCZ)993170000000055347
100   $a20100902d2009      uf             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe real effects of financial sector risk$b[electronic resource] /$fAlexander F. Tieman and Andrea M. Maechler
210   $a[Washington, D.C.] $cInternational Monetary Fund$d2009
215   $a1 online resource (49 p.)
225 1 $aIMF working paper ;$vWP/09/198
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4519-1768-6 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aCover Page; Title Page; Copyright Page; Contents; I. Introduction; II. Data; 1. Average Distance-to-Default in the Sample; 2. Average One-Year Expected Default Frequency; 1. The Distance-to-Default Measure; 3. Real Private Sector Credit Growth; III. Methodology; IV. Regresion Results and Discussion; 1. Macroeconomic Regressions-Distance-to-Default Indicators and Implied Effect on Credit Growth for Major European Banks; 2. Bank-Specific Regressions-Distance-to-Default Indicators and Implied Effect on Credit Growth for Major European Banks; V. Conclusion and Policy Implications
327   $aI. Data and Tables1. Data Summary; 2. Vector Error Correction Model Regression Results; 3. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using EDF1; 4. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using EDF5; 5. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using DD; 6. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using System DD; 7. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using DD Index; 8. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using Average Weighted DD
327   $a9. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using Average Weighted EDF110. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for Private Sector Credit Using Average Weighted EDF5; 11. Macroeconomic Panel Regression Results for GDP Using DD; 12. Bank-Specific Panel Regression Results Using EDF1; 13. Bank-Specific Panel Regression Results Using EDF5; 14. Bank-Specific Panel Regression Using DD; 15. Bank Specific Panel Regression Results Using EDF1 and Competition Controls; 16. Bank-Specific Panel Regression Results Using EDF5 and Competition Controls
327   $a17. Bank-Specific Panel Regression Results Using DD and Competition Controls18. Bank-Specific Panel Regression Results for GDP Using DD; References; Footnotes
330   $aThis paper estimates the magnitude of key effects on the real economy from financial sector stress. We focus on the short-run feedback effect from market-based indicators of financial sector risk to the real economy through the credit channel, and estimate this effect on an economy-wide (macro) level, as well as on the level of individual large banks. Both estimates yield significant feedback effects of substantial magnitude. The estimates are consistent with other work in this area. Our results suggest that prudential supervision could be enhanced by taking into account the feedback effects o
410  0$aIMF working paper ;$vWP/09/198.
606   $aFinancial risk
606   $aEconomic development
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aFinancial risk.
615  0$aEconomic development.
676   $a658.15
676   $a658.155
700   $aTieman$b Alexander F$0860313
701   $aMaechler$b Andrea M$0895005
712 02$aInternational Monetary Fund.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910463997503321
996   $aThe real effects of financial sector risk$92219595
997   $aUNINA