LEADER 05772nam 2200721 450 001 9910463797703321 005 20200903223051.0 010 $a90-272-6935-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000576707 035 $a(EBL)1847771 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001367490 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12543906 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001367490 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11428285 035 $a(PQKB)10939679 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1847771 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1847771 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10985903 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL663016 035 $a(OCoLC)895661482 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000576707 100 $a20140805h20142014 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aBavarian syntax $econtributions to the theory of syntax /$fedited by Gu?nther Grewendorf, University of Frankfurt, Helmut Weiss, University of Frankfurt 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d[2014] 210 4$d©2014 215 $a1 online resource (345 p.) 225 1 $aLinguistik aktuell = Linguistics today,$x0166-0829 ;$vvolume 220 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-5703-5 311 $a1-322-31734-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aBavarian Syntax; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of content ; Aspects of Bavarian syntax; Gu?nther Grewendorf; Aspects of Bavarian Syntax; 1. Dialect syntax and Universal Grammar; 2. Specific properties of Bavarian syntax; 2.1 Doubly filled COMP; 2.2 Complementizer agreement and partial pro-drop; 2.3 Extraction phenomena; 2.4 Negative concord; 2.5 The contributions; References; Syntactic and phonological properties of wh-operators and wh-movement in Bavarian; Josef Bayer; Syntactic and phonological properties of wh-operators and wh-movement in Bavarian; 1. Introduction 327 $a2. When wh moves to C3. Conceptual and theoretical motivation; 4. Judgments; 5. Production; 6. Extraction from wh-CPs; 7. Extraction to the specifier of wh-CPs: Emphatic topicalization; 8. Cliticization and consonantal epenthesis; 9. Complementizer inflection; 10. Conclusions and a glimpse beyond Bavarian; Acknowledgements; References; Complementizer agreement (in Bavarian); Feature inheritance or feature insertion?*; Eric Fuß; Complementizer agreement (in Bavarian); 1. Introduction; 2. In favor of a post-syntactic analysis; 2.1 Adjacency effects; 2.2 The rationale for feature inheritance 327 $a2.3 Right node raising2.4 Comparative deletion; 3. C-agr as feature insertion; 3.1 Lack of C-agr in comparatives/right node raising; 3.2 Double agreement; 3.3 Adjacency effects; 3.4 First conjunct agreement; 3.5 External possessor agreement (in West Flemish); 4. Conclusions; References; The rise and fall of double agreement; A comparison between Carinthian and Kansas Bukovina Bohemian; Melani Wratil*; The rise and fall of double agreement; 1. Introduction; 2. The Restoration of 1st person plural double agreement effects in Carinthian; 2.1 Word order and syntactic brackets in Carinthian 327 $a2.2 Strong and weak subject pronouns in Carinthian2.3 1st person plural double agreement in Carinthian; 2.4 The C-oriented 1st person plural marker; 2.5 Loss and restoration of double agreement; 3. Residual 1st person plural double agreement in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian; 3.1 Word order and syntactic brackets in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian; 3.2 Strong and weak subject pronouns in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian; 3.3 1st person plural double agreement and C-oriented agreement marking in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian; 3.4 The rise of uniform agreement; 3.5 Residual double agreement and homonymy flight 327 $a4. ConclusionReferences; Structures of 'Emphatic Topicalization' in Bavarian; Uli Lutz; Structures of 'Emphatic Topicalization' in Bavarian; 1. Basic properties of emphatic topicalization; 1.1 Complementizers in ET; 1.2 ET constituents; 1.3 ET movement and pied piping; 1.4 Summing up: Basic properties of ET constructions; 2. Rizzi me - Structural approaches to emphatic topicalization; 2.1 Emphasis (Bayer 2001, 2006; Bayer & Dasgupta (to appear)); 2.2 'Bavarian Extraction' (Grewendorf 2012); 2.3 To BE or ET, is this a question?; 3. ET and Standard German; 3.1 DFC considerations 327 $a3.2 Low or high C 330 $aThis essay is essentially a list of phenomena taken from the two large dialect areas of what is called Upper German (for German Oberdeutsch, South German (SG henceforth), comprising Austrian and Bavarian dialects as well as High Alemannic). The author himself speaks natively (base and high school) Viennese Austrian and the dialect of the Montafon, Vorarlberg, as samples of these two dialect areas. Although the critical assumptions of micro-linguistics (cf. Poletto 2000; Kayne 2013; Abraham & Leiss 2013) form the bottom seed, no theoretical discussions are entertained as consequences to the emp 410 0$aLinguistik aktuell ;$vBd. 220. 606 $aGerman language$xDialects$xBavarian 606 $aGerman language$xDialects$zGermany$zBavaria 606 $aGerman language$xSyntax 606 $aGerman language$xGrammar 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aGerman language$xDialects$xBavarian. 615 0$aGerman language$xDialects 615 0$aGerman language$xSyntax. 615 0$aGerman language$xGrammar. 676 $a437/.9433 702 $aGrewendorf$b Gu?nther 702 $aWeiss$b Helmut$f1961- 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910463797703321 996 $aBavarian syntax$92277586 997 $aUNINA