LEADER 03436nam 2200661 450 001 9910463687303321 005 20181019211611.0 010 $a1-4623-8606-7 010 $a1-4527-2183-1 010 $a9786612841637 010 $a1-282-84163-7 010 $a1-4518-7070-1 035 $a(CKB)3170000000056064 035 $a(EBL)1608028 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000944167 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11573592 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000944167 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10983261 035 $a(PQKB)11543345 035 $a(OCoLC)460991349 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1608028 035 $a(EXLCZ)993170000000056064 100 $a20140227h20082008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMauritius $ea competitiveness assessment /$fPatrick Imam and Camelia Minoiu ; authorized for distribution by Arend Kouwenaar 210 1$a[Washington, District of Columbia] :$cInternational Monetary Fund,$d2008. 210 4$dİ2008 215 $a1 online resource (35 p.) 225 0 $aIMF working paper ;$vWP/08/212 225 0$aIMF working paper ;$vWP/08/212 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4519-1523-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aC. Capital-Enhanced Equilibrium Exchange Rate Approach (CHEER) 6. FEER-SE Approach: Actual vs. Equilibrium REER; 7. CHEER Approach: Actual vs. Equilibrium NER; D. External Sustainability Approach (ES); IV. Structural Competitiveness Analysis; 8. Composite Indicators of Structural Competitiveness; 9. Relative Performance on Trade Costs; V. Conclusions; References; Appendix: List of Tables; 1. Summary Statistics for FEER-MB Approach; 2. Correlates of the Current Account Balance-Panel Estimates (1980-2005); 3. Unit Root Tests for the FEER-SE Approach; 4. Unit Root Tests for the CHEER Approach 327 $a5. Johansen Cointegration Test for the CHEER Approach 6. The Relative Performance of Mauritius on Trade Costs; 7. The Relative Performance of the Mauritius ICT Sector 330 $aWe assess the competitiveness of Mauritius in recent years using two approaches. First, we estimate the difference between the equilibrium and the actual real exchange rate using four methods: the macroeconomic balance approach, the single-equation fundamentals approach, the capital-enhanced approach, and the external sustainability approach. The methods consistently suggest that at the end of 2007 the exchange rate was aligned with its equilibrium value. Second, we undertake a comparative analysis of structural competitiveness indicators and find that Mauritius often fares better on business 606 $aCompetition$zMauritius$xEconometric models 606 $aForeign exchange rates$zMauritius$xEconometric models 606 $aEquilibrium (Economics)$xEconometric models 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aCompetition$xEconometric models. 615 0$aForeign exchange rates$xEconometric models. 615 0$aEquilibrium (Economics)$xEconometric models. 676 $a338.6048 700 $aImam$b Patrick A$0997042 701 $aMinoiu$b Camelia$0874355 701 $aKouwenaar$b Arend$0524507 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910463687303321 996 $aMauritius$92286489 997 $aUNINA