LEADER 03468nam  2200661   450 
001 9910463586203321
005 20181027005058.0
010   $a1-4623-0030-8
010   $a1-4527-5311-3
010   $a1-282-84109-2
010   $a9786612841095
010   $a1-4518-7016-7
035   $a(CKB)3170000000055055
035   $a(EBL)1607921
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000944163
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11524008
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000944163
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10982815
035   $a(PQKB)10956260
035   $a(OCoLC)762700108
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1607921
035   $a(EXLCZ)993170000000055055
100   $a20140226h20082008  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aLife expectancy and income convergence in the world $ea dynamic general equilibrium analysis /$fKenichi Ueda
210  1$a[Washington, District of Columbia] :$cInternational Monetary Fund,$d2008.
210  4$dİ2008
215   $a1 online resource (36 p.)
225 1 $aIMF Working Papers
225  0$aIMF working paper ;$vWP/08/158
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-4519-1469-5 
327   $aContents; I. Introduction; II. Model and Quantitative Results; A. Technology and Preference; B. Representative Agent; C. Neutrality of Longevity under Neoclassical Assumptions; D. Positive Value of Life with Costly Human Capital Transfer; III. Quantitative Assessment; A. Computable Form; B. Benchmark Parameter Values; C. Dynastic General Equilibrium Value of Life; D. Sensitivity Analysis; E. Income Convergence; IV. Case and Imperfect Altruism; V. Concluding Remarks; Reference; Figures; 1. Evolution of Life Expectancy; Tables; 1. Parameter Values; 2. Benchmark Quantitative Assessment
327   $a3. Sensitivity Analysis 4. Convergence of Income and Full Income; Appendices; I. Solutions; A. Optimal H/K Ratio; B. Euler Equation; II. Imperfect Altruism Case; A. Proof of Proposition 2; B. Proof of Proposition 3
330   $aThere is world-wide convergence in life expectancy, despite little convergence in GDP per capita. If one values longer life much more than material happiness, the world living standards may this have already converged substantially. This paper introduces the concept of the dynastic general equilibrium value of life to measure welfare gains from the increase in life expectancy. A calibration study finds sizable welfare gains, but these gains hardly mitigate the large inequality among countries. A conventional GDP-based measure remains a good approximation for (non) convergence in world living
410  0$aIMF Working Papers
606   $aLife expectancy$xEconometric models
606   $aIncome$xEconometric models
606   $aCost and standard of living$xEconometric models
606   $aConvergence (Economics)$xEconometric models
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aLife expectancy$xEconometric models.
615  0$aIncome$xEconometric models.
615  0$aCost and standard of living$xEconometric models.
615  0$aConvergence (Economics)$xEconometric models.
676   $a612.68
700   $aUeda$b Kenichi$0865251
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910463586203321
996   $aLife expectancy and income convergence in the world$92260300
997   $aUNINA