LEADER 02292nam  2200553 a 450 
001 9910463279503321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-8232-5249-3
010   $a0-8232-5025-3
035   $a(CKB)3170000000060560
035   $a(EBL)3239779
035   $a(OCoLC)923764117
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000783895
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11476079
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000783895
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10761834
035   $a(PQKB)11064929
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000124812
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3239779
035   $a(OCoLC)823741683
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse19463
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3239779
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10622844
035   $a(EXLCZ)993170000000060560
100   $a20121129d2013      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe open past$b[electronic resource] $esubjectivity and remembering the Talmud /$fSergey Dolgopolski
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aNew York $cFordham University Press$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (391 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-8232-4492-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $apt. I. Stakes -- pt. II. Who speaks? -- pt. III. Who thinks? -- pt. IV. Who remembers?.
330   $aThe Open Past challenges a view of time that has dominated philosophical thought for the past two centuries. In that view, time originates from a relationship to the future, and the past can be only a fictitious beginning, the necessary phantom of a starting point, a chronological period of Gbefore. G This view of the past has permeated the study of the Talmud as well, resulting in the application of modern philosophical categories such as the Gthinking subject,G subjectivity, and temporality to the thinking displayed in the texts of the Talmud. The book seeks to reclaim the originary power and
608   $aElectronic books.
676   $a296.1/406
700   $aDolgopol?skii?$b S. B$g(Sergei? Borisovich)$0877708
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910463279503321
996   $aThe open past$91959790
997   $aUNINA