LEADER 02895nam  2200625 a 450 
001 9910463112303321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-8047-8632-1
024 7 $a10.1515/9780804786324
035   $a(CKB)2670000000354989
035   $a(EBL)1180198
035   $a(OCoLC)841909856
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000872092
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12432780
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000872092
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10830820
035   $a(PQKB)11525234
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000155773
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1180198
035   $a(DE-B1597)564484
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780804786324
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1180198
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10692205
035   $a(OCoLC)1198929556
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000354989
100   $a20121210d2013      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe puzzle of unanimity$b[electronic resource] $econsensus on the United States Supreme Court /$fPamela C. Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, and Artemus Ward
210   $aStanford, Calif. $cStanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (216 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-8047-8472-8 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aThe Roosevelt court : the critical juncture from consensus to dissensus -- Closing the jaws of the decision-making vise : a theory and model of consensus -- A function of design : consensus in votes on the merits -- Monolithic solidarity : consensus in opinion writing -- An opportunity to clarify : unanimity and agenda setting.
330   $aThe U.S. Supreme Court typically rules on cases that present complex legal questions. Given the challenging nature of its cases and the popular view that the Court is divided along ideological lines, it's commonly assumed that the Court routinely hands down equally-divided decisions. Yet the justices actually issue unanimous decisions in approximately one third of the cases they decide.Drawing on data from the U.S. Supreme Court database, internal court documents, and the justices' private papers, The Puzzle of Unanimity provides the first comprehensive account of how the C
606   $aJudicial process$zUnited States
606   $aConsensus (Social sciences)$zUnited States
608   $aElectronic books.
615  0$aJudicial process
615  0$aConsensus (Social sciences)
676   $a347.73/26
700   $aCorley$b Pamela C.$f1967-$01030107
701   $aSteigerwalt$b Amy$f1976-$0882538
701   $aWard$b Artemus$f1971-$0892574
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910463112303321
996   $aThe puzzle of unanimity$92473158
997   $aUNINA