LEADER 05386nam 2200649Ia 450 001 9910462886603321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8213-9557-2 035 $a(CKB)2670000000340382 035 $a(EBL)1165940 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000856610 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12377396 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000856610 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10817963 035 $a(PQKB)11000322 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1165940 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1165940 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10685349 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL476603 035 $a(OCoLC)841909118 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000340382 100 $a20120813d2012 uf 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPower market structure$b[electronic resource] $erevisiting policy options /$fMaria Vagliasindi, John Besant-Jones 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cWorld Bank$d2012 215 $a1 online resource (476 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8213-9556-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aFront Cover; Title Page; Copyright; Contents; Box; Figures; Tables; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Objectives and Background; Analytical Framework and Approach; Conclusions; Executive Summary; Part 1 Power Market Structure and Performance: Evidence from a Global Database; Chapter 1 Power Market Structure and Performance: Analytical Framework; Introduction; What Does Theory Suggest on the Costs and Benefits of Alternative Market Structures?; What Does Empirical Evidence Suggest on the Costs and Benefits of Alternative Market Structures? 327 $aWhat Do We Know about the Taxonomy of Market Structures?Objectives; Methodology; Analytical Approach; Testing the Hypotheses; Evidence of Reform Outcomes from the Country Case Studies; Conclusions; Directions for New Research; Annex A; Annex B; Notes; References; Part 2 Case Studies: Large System Size and High GDP per Capita Economies; Chapter 2 Argentina; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Chapter 3 Brazil1; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Chapter 4 Chile; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure 327 $aImpact on Sector PerformanceChapter 5 Czech Republic; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Reference; Chapter 6 Arab Republic of Egypt; Reform History; Egypt's Private Power Generation Projects; The Return to Publicly Financed Power Projects; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Notes; Reference; Chapter 7 Indonesia; Reform History; 2005 Government Regulation on Public-Private Projects; Impact on Sector Structure and Performance; Notes; Chapter 8 Republic of Korea; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure 327 $aImpact on Sector PerformanceChapter 9 Peru; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Notes; Chapter 10 South Africa; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Reference; Chapter 11 Turkey; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; References; Part 3 Case Studies: Intermediate Economies; Chapter 12 Botswana; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Chapter 13 Andhra Pradesh; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Notes; References 327 $aChapter 14 GujaratReform History; Impact on Sector Performance; Reference; Chapter 15 West Bengal; Reform History; Impact on Sector Performance; Reference; Chapter 16 Jordan; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Note; Chapter 17 Vietnam; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Notes; Chapter 18 Zambia; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure; Impact on Sector Performance; Reference; Part 4 Case Studies: Small System Size and Low GDP per Capita Economies; Chapter 19 Kenya; Reform History; Impact on Sector Structure 327 $aImpact on Sector Performance 330 $aThe current distribution of power markets around intermediate structures between full integration and unbundling suggests that there has not been a linear path to reform in practice. Instead, many developing countries may retain intermediate structures in the foreseeable future. This possibility exposes a large gap in understanding about power market structures, since most theoretical work has focused on the two extreme structures and there is limited evidence on the impact of unbundling for developing countries.The study reports the evidence from statistical analysis and a representative samp 606 $aEnergy policy$zDeveloping countries 606 $aElectric power systems$zDeveloping countries 606 $aElectric utilities$zDeveloping countries 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aEnergy policy 615 0$aElectric power systems 615 0$aElectric utilities 676 $a333.7909172/4 700 $aVagliasindi$b Maria$0949341 701 $aBesant-Jones$b John$f1941-$0949343 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462886603321 996 $aPower market structure$92145668 997 $aUNINA