LEADER 03517nam 2200589Ia 450 001 9910462544803321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-59332-653-X 035 $a(CKB)2670000000271321 035 $a(EBL)1057815 035 $a(OCoLC)818818827 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000757946 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12317701 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000757946 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10771964 035 $a(PQKB)10673345 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1057815 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1057815 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10622742 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000271321 100 $a20100611d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aFreedom of religion$b[electronic resource] $eLocke v. Davey and state Blaine Amendments /$fDouglas F. Johnson 210 $aEl Paso $cLFB Scholarly Pub.$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (229 p.) 225 1 $aLaw & society : recent scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-59332-432-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCONTENTS; LIST OF TABLES; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS; INTRODUCTION; CHAPTER 1. HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS AND THE ""PROBLEM"" OF BLAINE AMENDMENTS; CHAPTER 2. BLAINE AMENDMENTS APPROACH THE SUPREME COURT; The Modern Context of Blaine Jurisprudence; Mitchell V. Helms; Zelman v. Simmons-Harris; CHAPTER 3. THE WASHINGTON PROMISE SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM AND LOCKE V. DAVEY; Briefs Amicus Curiae in Support of Davey; Briefs Amicus Curiae in Support of Locke; F. JEFFERSON'S BILL FOR ESTABLISHING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM WHICH BECAME THE VIRGINIA STATUTE FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 1779 327 $aCHAPTER 4. THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN LOCKE AND AN ANALYSIS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONSCHAPTER 5. POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF LOCKE V. DAVEY AND THE FUTURE OF BLAINE AMENDMENTS; Future Litigation; Policy Implications; Future Research; A. BLAINE CLAUSES IN CURRENT STATE CONSTITUTIONS; B. THE FIFTY STATES AND THEIR DATE OF STATEHOOD; C. NINETEENTH CENTURY PAPAL DECREES EXPRESSING HOSTILITY TO AMERICAN IDEOLOGY AND POLICY; D. THE FLUSHING REMONSTRANCE; E. MEMORIAL AND REMONSTRANCE AGAINST RELIGIOUS ASSESSMENTS, 20 JUNE 1785; BIBLIOGRAPHY; CASES CITED; INDEX 330 $aSo-called "Blaine Amendments" in state constitutions are under attack because they may restrict the flow of tax dollars into religious institutions. The prevailing argument against the state Blaine Amendments is that they are unconstitutional expressions of Nineteenth Century anti-Catholic sentiment. Through an examination of Nineteenth Century historical trends and the test of state constitutions, Johnson challenges that argument. While he does not dispute the anti-Catholic currents of the Nineteenth Century, his work demonstrates that Blaine amendment supporters had many different motives ot 410 0$aLaw and society (New York, N.Y.) 606 $aChurch and state$zUnited States 606 $aStudent aid$xLaw and legislation$zWashington (State) 607 $aWashington (State)$xTrials, litigation, etc 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aChurch and state 615 0$aStudent aid$xLaw and legislation 676 $a342.7308/52 700 $aJohnson$b Douglas F.$f1958-$01038996 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462544803321 996 $aFreedom of religion$92460878 997 $aUNINA